AFBOF
Price
$11.05
Change
+$0.05 (+0.45%)
Updated
Oct 13 closing price
Capitalization
2.21B
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
SLTFF
Price
$0.06
Change
+$0.02 (+50.00%)
Updated
Oct 14 closing price
Capitalization
2.41M
Intraday Buy/Sell Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFBOF vs SLTFF

Header iconAFBOF vs SLTFF Comparison
Open Charts AFBOF vs SLTFFBanner chart's image
African Rainbow Minerals
Price$11.05
Change+$0.05 (+0.45%)
Volume$600
Capitalization2.21B
Pegasus Resources
Price$0.06
Change+$0.02 (+50.00%)
Volume$5.52K
Capitalization2.41M
AFBOF vs SLTFF Comparison Chart in %
AFBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFBOF vs. SLTFF commentary
Oct 18, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFBOF is a Hold and SLTFF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Oct 18, 2025
Stock price -- (AFBOF: $11.05 vs. SLTFF: $0.06)
Brand notoriety: AFBOF and SLTFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFBOF: 271% vs. SLTFF: 11%
Market capitalization -- AFBOF: $2.21B vs. SLTFF: $2.41M
AFBOF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $2.21B. SLTFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $2.41M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.65B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFBOF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileSLTFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFBOF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • SLTFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFBOF is a better buy in the long-term than SLTFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFBOF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while SLTFF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFBOF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.
  • SLTFF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, SLTFF is a better buy in the short-term than AFBOF.

Price Growth

AFBOF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +0.45% price change this week, while SLTFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +38.10% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.05%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +27.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +253.12%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.05% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFBOF($2.21B) has a higher market cap than SLTFF($2.41M). AFBOF YTD gains are higher at: 35.583 vs. SLTFF (-10.078). AFBOF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.43B vs. SLTFF (-1.39M). AFBOF has more cash in the bank: 9.25B vs. SLTFF (21.2K). SLTFF has less debt than AFBOF: SLTFF (60K) vs AFBOF (2.04B). AFBOF has higher revenues than SLTFF: AFBOF (11.7B) vs SLTFF (0).
AFBOFSLTFFAFBOF / SLTFF
Capitalization2.21B2.41M91,632%
EBITDA1.43B-1.39M-102,315%
Gain YTD35.583-10.078-353%
P/E Ratio114.28N/A-
Revenue11.7B0-
Total Cash9.25B21.2K43,641,509%
Total Debt2.04B60K3,391,667%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFBOF vs SLTFF: Fundamental Ratings
AFBOF
SLTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9589
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
5
Undervalued
60
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
9899
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4360
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/an/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFBOF's Valuation (5) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for SLTFF (60). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew somewhat faster than SLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFBOF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as SLTFF (100). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew similarly to SLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFBOF's SMR Rating (98) in the null industry is in the same range as SLTFF (99). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew similarly to SLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFBOF's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as SLTFF (60). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew similarly to SLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFBOF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for SLTFF (99). This means that AFBOF’s stock grew significantly faster than SLTFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFBOFSLTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
65%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
57%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
71%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
SLTFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
ASIX19.630.15
+0.77%
AdvanSix
WWD247.510.54
+0.22%
Woodward
TCRT3.07-0.03
-0.97%
Alaunos Therapeutics Inc.
STHO7.44-0.09
-1.20%
Star Holdings
ENVX11.21-0.30
-2.61%
Enovix Corp

AFBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFBOF has been loosely correlated with CAPFF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 36% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFBOF jumps, then CAPFF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFBOF
1D Price
Change %
AFBOF100%
N/A
CAPFF - AFBOF
36%
Loosely correlated
N/A
GRRLF - AFBOF
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
LTRBF - AFBOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
JMXXF - AFBOF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SLGGF - AFBOF
21%
Poorly correlated
-9.62%
More

SLTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SLTFF and GLATF have been poorly correlated (+27% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SLTFF and GLATF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SLTFF
1D Price
Change %
SLTFF100%
N/A
GLATF - SLTFF
27%
Poorly correlated
+0.62%
ENCTF - SLTFF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
MGMNF - SLTFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.72%
NICLF - SLTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
-15.11%
AFBOF - SLTFF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More