Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFBSX vs RTPIX
AFBSX vs RTPIX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFBSX vs. RTPIX commentary
Nov 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFBSX is a Hold and RTPIX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RTPIX has more cash in the bank: 529K vs. AFBSX (420K). RTPIX pays higher dividends than AFBSX: RTPIX (5.91) vs AFBSX (0.00). AFBSX was incepted earlier than RTPIX: AFBSX (21 years) vs RTPIX (21 years). AFBSX (4.83) is less costly to investors than RTPIX (3.14). AFBSX (15000) and RTPIX (15000) have matching initial minimum investment requirements. AFBSX (15000) and RTPIX (15000) have similar IRA initial investment minimum. RTPIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.79 vs. AFBSX (-4.94). RTPIX return over 5 years is better than : 33.34 vs. AFBSX (-16.33).
| AFBSX | RTPIX | AFBSX / RTPIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 2.78 | 1.78 | 156% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 4.83 | 3.14 | 154% |
| Fund Existence | 21 years | 21 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -5.812 | -3.540 | 164% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 15000 | 15000 | 100% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | 15000 | 15000 | 100% |
| Net Assets | 420K | 529K | 79% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 5.91 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.94 | -0.79 | 623% |
| Returns for 3 years | -16.24 | 10.62 | -153% |
| Returns for 5 years | -16.33 | 33.34 | -49% |
| Returns for 10 years | -44.93 | 5.47 | -822% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement