Ad is loading...
AFCMX vs RERAX
AFCMX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts AFCMX vs RERAX
American Century Focused Intl Gr R6
Price$16.81
Change+$0.11 (+0.66%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.46M
American Funds Europacific Growth R1
Price$51.43
Change+$0.16 (+0.31%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets127.3B
AFCMX vs RERAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCMX vs. RERAX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCMX is a Buy and RERAX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 127B vs. AFCMX (127M). RERAX pays higher dividends than AFCMX: RERAX (0.91) vs AFCMX (0.64). AFCMX was incepted earlier than RERAX: AFCMX (9 years) vs RERAX (23 years). AFCMX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 61.00 vs. RERAX (34.00). AFCMX has a lower initial minimum investment than RERAX: AFCMX (0) vs RERAX (250). AFCMX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.76 vs. RERAX (2.84). AFCMX return over 5 years is better than : 13.81 vs. RERAX (-3.31).
| AFCMX | RERAX | AFCMX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 9 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.143 | 1.983 | 58% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 0 | 250 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 127M | 127B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.64 | 0.91 | 70% |
| Returns for 1 year | 8.76 | 2.84 | 308% |
| Returns for 3 years | -8.88 | -10.59 | 84% |
| Returns for 5 years | 13.81 | -3.31 | -417% |
| Returns for 10 years | N/A | 14.73 | - |