Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFCSX vs RERAX
AFCSX vs RERAX Comparison
Open Charts AFCSX vs RERAX
AFCSX vs RERAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFCSX vs. RERAX commentary
Jun 25, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFCSX is a Hold and RERAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RERAX has more cash in the bank: 143B vs. AFCSX (201M). RERAX pays higher dividends than AFCSX: RERAX (2.19) vs AFCSX (0.21). AFCSX was incepted earlier than RERAX: AFCSX (10 years) vs RERAX (24 years). RERAX (1.57) is less costly to investors than AFCSX (0.90). AFCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 90.00 vs. RERAX (50.00). RERAX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFCSX: RERAX (250) vs AFCSX (5000000). RERAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.97 vs. AFCSX (2.96). AFCSX return over 5 years is better than : -6.84 vs. RERAX (-11.02).
| AFCSX | RERAX | AFCSX / RERAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.57 | 57% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.90 | 1.57 | 57% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.157 | 2.387 | 7% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 201M | 143B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.21 | 2.19 | 10% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.96 | 5.97 | 49% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.55 | 17.89 | 121% |
| Returns for 5 years | -6.84 | -11.02 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.92 | 46.32 | 229% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement