It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileHMN’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFG’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while HMN’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
AFG (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +7.47% price change this week, while HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was -4.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +0.71%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +4.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.36%.
AFG is expected to report earnings on Jan 29, 2025.
HMN is expected to report earnings on Feb 11, 2025.
Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.
AFG | HMN | AFG / HMN | |
Capitalization | 11.3B | 1.5B | 756% |
EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
Gain YTD | 26.328 | 28.643 | 92% |
P/E Ratio | 13.41 | 33.55 | 40% |
Revenue | 7.73B | 1.43B | 539% |
Total Cash | 1.75B | 552M | 316% |
Total Debt | 1.48B | 546M | 270% |
AFG | HMN | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 73 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 53 Fair valued | 30 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 15 | 72 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 79 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 45 | 40 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 42 | 95 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 50 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
HMN's Valuation (30) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (53) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.
AFG's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (72) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.
AFG's SMR Rating (79) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (87) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AFG’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.
HMN's Price Growth Rating (40) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as AFG (45) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to AFG’s over the last 12 months.
AFG's P/E Growth Rating (42) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for HMN (95) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that AFG’s stock grew somewhat faster than HMN’s over the last 12 months.
AFG | HMN | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago54% | 1 day ago77% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago48% | 1 day ago63% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago64% | 1 day ago63% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago60% | 1 day ago59% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% | 1 day ago51% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago58% | 1 day ago55% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 1 day ago55% | 9 days ago55% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 11 days ago45% | 1 day ago55% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago53% | 1 day ago57% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago62% | 1 day ago57% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
MSOX | 0.91 | 0.14 | +17.71% |
AdvisorShares MSOS 2x Daily ETF | |||
VIG | 201.61 | 0.02 | +0.01% |
Vanguard Dividend Appreciation ETF | |||
AVSU | 67.97 | -0.13 | -0.20% |
Avantis Responsible US Equity ETF | |||
FIDI | 19.92 | -0.11 | -0.54% |
Fidelity International High Div ETF | |||
VTWG | 222.13 | -2.52 | -1.12% |
Vanguard Russell 2000 Growth ETF |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been loosely correlated with L. These tickers have moved in lockstep 54% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then L could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To HMN | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
HMN | 100% | -2.92% | ||
L - HMN | 54% Loosely correlated | +0.29% | ||
SAFT - HMN | 54% Loosely correlated | -0.93% | ||
UFCS - HMN | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.43% | ||
RLI - HMN | 47% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
THG - HMN | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.90% | ||
More |