HMN
Price
$45.41
Change
+$0.67 (+1.50%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.83B
16 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
UFCS
Price
$40.38
Change
+$1.04 (+2.64%)
Updated
Apr 17 closing price
Capitalization
1.03B
22 days until earnings call
Intraday BUY SELL Signals
Interact to see
Advertisement

HMN vs UFCS

Header iconHMN vs UFCS Comparison
Open Charts HMN vs UFCSBanner chart's image
HMN vs UFCS Comparison Chart in %
loading
loading
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
HMN vs. UFCS commentary
Apr 20, 2026

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is HMN is a Hold and UFCS is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 20, 2026
Stock price -- (HMN: $45.41 vs. UFCS: $40.38)
Brand notoriety: HMN and UFCS are both not notable
Both companies represent the Property/Casualty Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: HMN: 86% vs. UFCS: 88%
Market capitalization -- HMN: $1.83B vs. UFCS: $1.03B
HMN [@Property/Casualty Insurance] is valued at $1.83B. UFCS’s [@Property/Casualty Insurance] market capitalization is $1.03B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry ranges from $128.52B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Property/Casualty Insurance] industry is $17.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

HMN’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileUFCS’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • HMN’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • UFCS’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, UFCS is a better buy in the long-term than HMN.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

HMN’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish while UFCS’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • HMN’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • UFCS’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, HMN is a better buy in the short-term than UFCS.

Price Growth

HMN (@Property/Casualty Insurance) experienced а +2.69% price change this week, while UFCS (@Property/Casualty Insurance) price change was +3.17% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Property/Casualty Insurance industry was +3.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.60%.

Reported Earning Dates

HMN is expected to report earnings on May 06, 2026.

UFCS is expected to report earnings on May 12, 2026.

Industries' Descriptions

@Property/Casualty Insurance (+3.21% weekly)

Property and casualty companies insure against accidents of non-physical harm, such as lawsuits, damage to personal assets, car crashes and more. Progressive Corporation, Travelers Companies, Inc. and Allstate Corporation are some of the biggest providers of such products.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
HMN($1.83B) has a higher market cap than UFCS($1.03B). HMN has higher P/E ratio than UFCS: HMN (11.64) vs UFCS (9.01). UFCS YTD gains are higher at: 11.674 vs. HMN (-0.826). UFCS has less debt than HMN: UFCS (146M) vs HMN (843M). HMN has higher revenues than UFCS: HMN (1.63B) vs UFCS (1.39B).
HMNUFCSHMN / UFCS
Capitalization1.83B1.03B177%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD-0.82611.674-7%
P/E Ratio11.649.01129%
Revenue1.63B1.39B117%
Total CashN/A1.27B-
Total Debt843M146M577%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
HMN vs UFCS: Fundamental Ratings
HMN
UFCS
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
32
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5464
SMR RATING
1..100
7760
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4942
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8682
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

HMN's Valuation (32) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (46) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

HMN's Profit vs Risk Rating (54) in the Multi Line Insurance industry is in the same range as UFCS (64) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry. This means that HMN’s stock grew similarly to UFCS’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's SMR Rating (60) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (77) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's Price Growth Rating (42) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (49) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

UFCS's P/E Growth Rating (82) in the Property Or Casualty Insurance industry is in the same range as HMN (86) in the Multi Line Insurance industry. This means that UFCS’s stock grew similarly to HMN’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
HMNUFCS
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
61%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
72%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
71%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
71%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
51%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
52%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
64%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
53%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
56%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
HMN
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
UFCS
Daily Signal:
Gain/Loss:
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
BAILX11.730.25
+2.18%
Brown Advisory Sustainable Intl Ldrs Ins
HGHVX48.200.78
+1.64%
Hartford Healthcare R6
CSCIX15.570.22
+1.43%
Cohen & Steers Real Estate Securities C
NASDX47.920.61
+1.29%
Shelton Nasdaq-100 Index Investor
IGNCX18.92-0.24
-1.25%
Nomura Natural Resources C

HMN and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, HMN has been closely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 66% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if HMN jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To HMN
1D Price
Change %
HMN100%
+1.50%
SAFT - HMN
66%
Closely correlated
+1.28%
ORI - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+2.36%
HIG - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.13%
THG - HMN
63%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
CNA - HMN
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.09%
More

UFCS and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, UFCS has been loosely correlated with SAFT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if UFCS jumps, then SAFT could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To UFCS
1D Price
Change %
UFCS100%
+2.64%
SAFT - UFCS
64%
Loosely correlated
+1.28%
CINF - UFCS
60%
Loosely correlated
+2.12%
THG - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.96%
HMN - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.50%
MCY - UFCS
59%
Loosely correlated
+1.88%
More