AFGVF
Price
$0.73
Change
+$0.05 (+7.35%)
Updated
Dec 16 closing price
Capitalization
399.34M
EMFGF
Price
$0.04
Change
+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Updated
Apr 9 closing price
Capitalization
51.84M
Ad is loading...

AFGVF vs EMFGF

Header iconAFGVF vs EMFGF Comparison
Open Charts AFGVF vs EMFGFBanner chart's image
Agfa-Gavaert
Price$0.73
Change+$0.05 (+7.35%)
Volume$500
Capitalization399.34M
Fluence
Price$0.04
Change+$0.01 (+33.33%)
Volume$20K
Capitalization51.84M
AFGVF vs EMFGF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFGVF vs. EMFGF commentary
Apr 16, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGVF is a Hold and EMFGF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Apr 16, 2025
Stock price -- (AFGVF: $0.73 vs. EMFGF: $0.04)
Brand notoriety: AFGVF and EMFGF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Industrial Machinery industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFGVF: 100% vs. EMFGF: 387%
Market capitalization -- AFGVF: $399.34M vs. EMFGF: $51.84M
AFGVF [@Industrial Machinery] is valued at $399.34M. EMFGF’s [@Industrial Machinery] market capitalization is $51.84M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Industrial Machinery] industry ranges from $135.33B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Industrial Machinery] industry is $9.38B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFGVF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileEMFGF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFGVF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • EMFGF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AFGVF and EMFGF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Price Growth

AFGVF (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while EMFGF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was -12.50% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +4.98%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -4.20%, and the average quarterly price growth was -8.56%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Industrial Machinery (+4.98% weekly)

The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFGVF($399M) has a higher market cap than EMFGF($51.8M). EMFGF YTD gains are higher at: 8.376 vs. AFGVF (0.000). EMFGF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -13.85M vs. AFGVF (-105M). AFGVF has more cash in the bank: 111M vs. EMFGF (40.8M). EMFGF has less debt than AFGVF: EMFGF (37.2M) vs AFGVF (86M). AFGVF has higher revenues than EMFGF: AFGVF (1.88B) vs EMFGF (90.3M).
AFGVFEMFGFAFGVF / EMFGF
Capitalization399M51.8M770%
EBITDA-105M-13.85M758%
Gain YTD0.0008.376-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.88B90.3M2,076%
Total Cash111M40.8M272%
Total Debt86M37.2M231%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
EMFGF: Fundamental Ratings
EMFGF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
95
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
85
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
60
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
47

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OSS2.210.13
+6.25%
One Stop Systems
GEO29.660.65
+2.24%
GEO Group (The)
MNMD5.550.12
+2.21%
Mind Medicine (MindMed)
CAE23.110.39
+1.72%
CAE
PEP146.752.32
+1.61%
PepsiCo

AFGVF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AFGVF and EMFGF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AFGVF and EMFGF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFGVF
1D Price
Change %
AFGVF100%
N/A
EMFGF - AFGVF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMROF - AFGVF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FCHRF - AFGVF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RWCI - AFGVF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
IRRHF - AFGVF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

EMFGF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that EMFGF and AFGVF have been poorly correlated (+20% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that EMFGF and AFGVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To EMFGF
1D Price
Change %
EMFGF100%
N/A
AFGVF - EMFGF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
EBCOY - EMFGF
10%
Poorly correlated
+1.43%
ECTXF - EMFGF
10%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FANUY - EMFGF
5%
Poorly correlated
+0.42%
FLIDY - EMFGF
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More