It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AFGVY’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileALFVF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AFGVY’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while ALFVF’s TA Score has 1 bullish TA indicator(s).
AFGVY (@Industrial Machinery) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ALFVF (@Industrial Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Industrial Machinery industry was +1.91%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.42%.
AFGVY is expected to report earnings on Mar 12, 2025.
The industry makes and maintains machines for consumers, the industry, and most other companies. While it has traditionally been categorized as heavy industry, some smaller companies are also branching into the light category. The industry is pivotal in providing the equipment for production in businesses like agriculture, mining, industry and construction, gas, electricity and water utilities. It also supplies supporting equipment for almost all sectors of the economy, such as equipment for heating, and air conditioning of buildings. Illinois Tool Works Inc., Parker-Hannifin Corporation and Rockwell Automation Inc are some of the major U.S. companies operating in this industry.
AFGVY | ALFVF | AFGVY / ALFVF | |
Capitalization | 399M | 15.5B | 3% |
EBITDA | -105M | 10.4B | -1% |
Gain YTD | -54.134 | 32.291 | -168% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 29.15 | - |
Revenue | 1.88B | 59.7B | 3% |
Total Cash | 111M | 3.47B | 3% |
Total Debt | 86M | 18.3B | 0% |
AFGVY | ALFVF | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 9 | 98 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 98 Overvalued | 64 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 91 | 50 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 93 | 49 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 43 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 55 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
ALFVF's Valuation (64) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFGVY (98). This means that ALFVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFGVY’s over the last 12 months.
ALFVF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFGVY (100). This means that ALFVF’s stock grew significantly faster than AFGVY’s over the last 12 months.
ALFVF's SMR Rating (50) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFGVY (91). This means that ALFVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFGVY’s over the last 12 months.
ALFVF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFGVY (93). This means that ALFVF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFGVY’s over the last 12 months.
ALFVF's P/E Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is in the same range as AFGVY (49). This means that ALFVF’s stock grew similarly to AFGVY’s over the last 12 months.
AFGVY | ALFVF | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago20% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago21% | 3 days ago17% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago18% | N/A |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago13% | 3 days ago39% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago25% | 3 days ago24% |
Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago36% | N/A |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
UEMPX | 7.84 | N/A | N/A |
UBS Emerging Markets Equity Opp P | |||
FAUFX | 45.92 | -0.32 | -0.69% |
Fidelity Advisor Utilities M | |||
RFNBX | 89.31 | -0.75 | -0.83% |
American Funds Fundamental Invs R2 | |||
EMGCX | 21.27 | -0.19 | -0.89% |
Allspring Emerging Markets Equity C | |||
NSMRX | 34.62 | -0.46 | -1.31% |
Nuveen Small/Mid-Cap Value I |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFGVY has been closely correlated with DOCKF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 86% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFGVY jumps, then DOCKF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFGVY | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AFGVY | 100% | N/A | ||
DOCKF - AFGVY | 86% Closely correlated | N/A | ||
HSYDF - AFGVY | 44% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
HURC - AFGVY | 26% Poorly correlated | +1.10% | ||
ADERY - AFGVY | 6% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
ALFVF - AFGVY | 1% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that ALFVF and MRRLF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ALFVF and MRRLF's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To ALFVF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
ALFVF | 100% | N/A | ||
MRRLF - ALFVF | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
FCHRF - ALFVF | 25% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MKEWF - ALFVF | 24% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
MIDD - ALFVF | 23% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
JBT - ALFVF | 20% Poorly correlated | -1.02% | ||
More |