Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$32.89
Change-$0.15 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets22.46M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$71.01
Change+$0.10 (+0.14%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets162.63B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Sep 17, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 163B vs. AFGZX (22.5M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.22) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 14.60 vs. AFGZX (0.30). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 36.67 vs. AFGZX (22.55).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.765 | 18.212 | 70% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 22.5M | 163B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.22 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.30 | 14.60 | 2% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.29 | 50.70 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 22.55 | 36.67 | 62% |
| Returns for 10 years | 80.62 | 98.78 | 82% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement