Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFGZX vs RNPCX
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison
Open Charts AFGZX vs RNPCX
Alger Global Equity Z
Price$30.20
Change+$0.27 (+0.90%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets21.3M
American Funds New Perspective R3
Price$64.84
Change+$0.50 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets149.99B
AFGZX vs RNPCX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFGZX vs. RNPCX commentary
Jun 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFGZX is a Buy and RNPCX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RNPCX has more cash in the bank: 150B vs. AFGZX (21.3M). RNPCX pays higher dividends than AFGZX: RNPCX (0.24) vs AFGZX (0.00). AFGZX was incepted earlier than RNPCX: AFGZX (12 years) vs RNPCX (23 years). AFGZX (1.97) is less costly to investors than RNPCX (1.06). AFGZX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 93.65 vs. RNPCX (24.00). RNPCX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFGZX: RNPCX (250) vs AFGZX (500000). RNPCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 10.10 vs. AFGZX (-4.38). RNPCX return over 5 years is better than : 42.02 vs. AFGZX (26.34).
| AFGZX | RNPCX | AFGZX / RNPCX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.99 | 1.06 | 93% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.97 | 1.06 | 186% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 2.150 | 7.941 | 27% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 500000 | 250 | 200,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 21.3M | 150B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.00 | 0.24 | - |
| Returns for 1 year | -4.38 | 10.10 | -43% |
| Returns for 3 years | 16.64 | 28.02 | 59% |
| Returns for 5 years | 26.34 | 42.02 | 63% |
| Returns for 10 years | 48.21 | 72.06 | 67% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement