AFL
Price
$104.57
Change
+$1.05 (+1.01%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
49.4B
31 days until earnings call
MFC
Price
$31.88
Change
+$0.43 (+1.37%)
Updated
Jul 3 closing price
Capitalization
44.61B
32 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFL vs MFC

Header iconAFL vs MFC Comparison
Open Charts AFL vs MFCBanner chart's image
Aflac
Price$104.57
Change+$1.05 (+1.01%)
Volume$994.9K
Capitalization49.4B
Manulife Financial
Price$31.88
Change+$0.43 (+1.37%)
Volume$936.89K
Capitalization44.61B
AFL vs MFC Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFL vs. MFC commentary
Jul 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFL is a StrongBuy and MFC is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AFL: $104.57 vs. MFC: $31.88)
Brand notoriety: AFL and MFC are both not notable
Both companies represent the Life/Health Insurance industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFL: 44% vs. MFC: 41%
Market capitalization -- AFL: $49.4B vs. MFC: $44.61B
AFL [@Life/Health Insurance] is valued at $49.4B. MFC’s [@Life/Health Insurance] market capitalization is $44.61B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry ranges from $133.31B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Life/Health Insurance] industry is $24.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFL’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileMFC’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFL’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • MFC’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFL is a better buy in the long-term than MFC.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MFC’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • MFC’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, MFC is a better buy in the short-term than AFL.

Price Growth

AFL (@Life/Health Insurance) experienced а +0.64% price change this week, while MFC (@Life/Health Insurance) price change was -0.62% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Life/Health Insurance industry was +0.80%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.04%, and the average quarterly price growth was +9.76%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFL is expected to report earnings on Aug 05, 2025.

MFC is expected to report earnings on Aug 06, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Life/Health Insurance (+0.80% weekly)

Life insurance companies mainly sell policies that pay a death benefit as a lump sum upon the death of the insured to their beneficiaries. Life insurance policies may be sold as term life, (which guarantees payment of a stated death benefit and expires at the end of a specified term) or permanent /typically whole life (which is more expensive but lasts a lifetime and carries a cash accumulation component). Life insurance firms may also sell long-term disability policies that help to replace the insured individual’s income if they become sick or disabled. Health insurance, on the other hand, helps pay for medical expenses. Anthem, Inc., MetLife, Inc. and Aflac Incorporated are some of the largest U.S. companies in this industry.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFL($49.4B) has a higher market cap than MFC($44.6B). MFC has higher P/E ratio than AFL: MFC (12.74) vs AFL (10.95). MFC YTD gains are higher at: 3.810 vs. AFL (2.219). AFL has more cash in the bank: 77.6B vs. MFC (20.3B). AFL has less debt than MFC: AFL (7.36B) vs MFC (12.7B). MFC has higher revenues than AFL: MFC (42.3B) vs AFL (18.8B).
AFLMFCAFL / MFC
Capitalization49.4B44.6B111%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD2.2193.81058%
P/E Ratio10.9512.7486%
Revenue18.8B42.3B44%
Total Cash77.6B20.3B382%
Total Debt7.36B12.7B58%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFL vs MFC: Fundamental Ratings
AFL
MFC
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
3067
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
71
Overvalued
36
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
312
SMR RATING
1..100
95100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
3951
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
1452
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

MFC's Valuation (36) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFL (71). This means that MFC’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFL’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Profit vs Risk Rating (3) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (12). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's SMR Rating (95) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (100). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's Price Growth Rating (39) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is in the same range as MFC (51). This means that AFL’s stock grew similarly to MFC’s over the last 12 months.

AFL's P/E Growth Rating (14) in the Life Or Health Insurance industry is somewhat better than the same rating for MFC (52). This means that AFL’s stock grew somewhat faster than MFC’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFLMFC
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
46%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
62%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
79%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
60%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
57%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
56%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 5 days ago
59%
Bullish Trend 13 days ago
62%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 11 days ago
43%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
57%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
47%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MFC
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
KBWP120.741.58
+1.33%
Invesco KBW Property & Casualty Ins ETF
SUSA128.080.83
+0.65%
iShares ESG Optimized MSCI USA ETF
XNOV35.660.19
+0.52%
FT Vest US Eq Enh & Mod Buf ETF-Nov
CURE79.73N/A
N/A
Direxion Daily Healthcare Bull 3X ETF
FEBU25.75N/A
N/A
AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer15 UncFebETF