Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFMCX vs NAESX
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts AFMCX vs NAESX
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
Price$14.97
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets99.38M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$121.46
Change+$0.30 (+0.25%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets154.18B
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFMCX vs. NAESX commentary
Aug 30, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMCX is a Buy and NAESX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 154B vs. AFMCX (99.4M). NAESX pays higher dividends than AFMCX: NAESX (1.25) vs AFMCX (0.02). AFMCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: AFMCX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). AFMCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). AFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. NAESX (13.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFMCX: NAESX (3000) vs AFMCX (10000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.99 vs. AFMCX (7.26). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 60.61 vs. AFMCX (54.68).
| AFMCX | NAESX | AFMCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.17 | 882% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.17 | 1,153% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 6.624 | 5.381 | 123% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 3000 | 333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 99.4M | 154B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.25 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | 7.26 | 9.99 | 73% |
| Returns for 3 years | 15.09 | 32.16 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | 54.68 | 60.61 | 90% |
| Returns for 10 years | 40.86 | 130.39 | 31% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement