Ad is loading...
AFMCX vs NAESX
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison
Open Charts AFMCX vs NAESX
Acuitas US Microcap Institutional
Price$12.16
Change+$0.21 (+1.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets79.33M
Vanguard Small Cap Index I
Price$108.34
Change+$1.71 (+1.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets153.45B
AFMCX vs NAESX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFMCX vs. NAESX commentary
Apr 04, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMCX is a Hold and NAESX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
NAESX has more cash in the bank: 153B vs. AFMCX (79.3M). NAESX pays higher dividends than AFMCX: NAESX (1.39) vs AFMCX (0.02). AFMCX was incepted earlier than NAESX: AFMCX (11 years) vs NAESX (65 years). AFMCX (1.96) is less costly to investors than NAESX (0.17). AFMCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 64.00 vs. NAESX (12.00). NAESX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFMCX: NAESX (3000) vs AFMCX (10000). NAESX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -0.01 vs. AFMCX (-12.06). NAESX return over 5 years is better than : 112.27 vs. AFMCX (90.33).
| AFMCX | NAESX | AFMCX / NAESX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.50 | 0.17 | 882% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.96 | 0.17 | 1,153% |
| Fund Existence | 11 years | 65 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -13.390 | -7.319 | 183% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 10000 | 3000 | 333% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 79.3M | 153B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.02 | 1.39 | 2% |
| Returns for 1 year | -12.06 | -0.01 | 102,770% |
| Returns for 3 years | -12.18 | 4.92 | -248% |
| Returns for 5 years | 90.33 | 112.27 | 80% |
| Returns for 10 years | 9.67 | 88.79 | 11% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers