AFMJF
Price
$0.67
Change
+$0.02 (+3.08%)
Updated
May 21 closing price
Capitalization
980.36M
BHP
Price
$49.16
Change
-$0.18 (-0.36%)
Updated
May 22, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
146.11B
87 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFMJF vs BHP

Header iconAFMJF vs BHP Comparison
Open Charts AFMJF vs BHPBanner chart's image
Alphamin Resources
Price$0.67
Change+$0.02 (+3.08%)
Volume$136.52K
Capitalization980.36M
BHP Group
Price$49.16
Change-$0.18 (-0.36%)
Volume$16.25K
Capitalization146.11B
AFMJF vs BHP Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFMJF vs. BHP commentary
May 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMJF is a StrongBuy and BHP is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AFMJF: $0.67 vs. BHP: $49.34)
Brand notoriety: AFMJF: Not notable vs. BHP: Notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFMJF: 32% vs. BHP: 53%
Market capitalization -- AFMJF: $980.36M vs. BHP: $146.11B
AFMJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $980.36M. BHP’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $146.11B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $3.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFMJF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBHP’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AFMJF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BHP’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the long-term than AFMJF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFMJF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHP’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFMJF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • BHP’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, BHP is a better buy in the short-term than AFMJF.

Price Growth

AFMJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +4.30% price change this week, while BHP (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was -1.91% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +2.21%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.46%.

Reported Earning Dates

BHP is expected to report earnings on Aug 18, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+2.21% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHP($146B) has a higher market cap than AFMJF($980M). BHP has higher P/E ratio than AFMJF: BHP (20.02) vs AFMJF (13.14). BHP YTD gains are higher at: 3.078 vs. AFMJF (-9.941). BHP has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 22.6B vs. AFMJF (161M). BHP has more cash in the bank: 10.6B vs. AFMJF (3.2K). AFMJF has less debt than BHP: AFMJF (12.1M) vs BHP (22.4B). BHP has higher revenues than AFMJF: BHP (55.3B) vs AFMJF (328M).
AFMJFBHPAFMJF / BHP
Capitalization980M146B1%
EBITDA161M22.6B1%
Gain YTD-9.9413.078-323%
P/E Ratio13.1420.0266%
Revenue328M55.3B1%
Total Cash3.2K10.6B0%
Total Debt12.1M22.4B0%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFMJF vs BHP: Fundamental Ratings
AFMJF
BHP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
266
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
3
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5238
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5556
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
9794
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a14

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFMJF's Valuation (3) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (5) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's Profit vs Risk Rating (38) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as AFMJF (52) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's SMR Rating (100) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as AFMJF (100) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's Price Growth Rating (55) in the null industry is in the same range as BHP (56) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry. This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to BHP’s over the last 12 months.

BHP's P/E Growth Rating (94) in the Other Metals Or Minerals industry is in the same range as AFMJF (97) in the null industry. This means that BHP’s stock grew similarly to AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFMJFBHP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
81%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
60%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
83%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
61%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
78%
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 15 days ago
82%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
60%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
63%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
MGRM2.800.04
+1.45%
Monogram Orthopaedics
NNN41.09-0.74
-1.77%
NNN Reit
CRM282.28-5.78
-2.01%
Salesforce
MBIN32.02-0.80
-2.44%
Merchants Bancorp
IVA3.11-0.19
-5.72%
Inventiva SA

AFMJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFMJF has been loosely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFMJF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFMJF
1D Price
Change %
AFMJF100%
+2.75%
LYSDY - AFMJF
37%
Loosely correlated
-1.53%
LYSCF - AFMJF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.81%
RIO - AFMJF
29%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
BHP - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
BDNNY - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
-0.99%
More