AFMJF
Price
$0.78
Change
-$0.01 (-1.27%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
993.22M
TLOFF
Price
$0.30
Change
+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Updated
Aug 12 closing price
Capitalization
343.64M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFMJF vs TLOFF

Header iconAFMJF vs TLOFF Comparison
Open Charts AFMJF vs TLOFFBanner chart's image
Alphamin Resources
Price$0.78
Change-$0.01 (-1.27%)
Volume$332.48K
Capitalization993.22M
Talon Metals
Price$0.30
Change+$0.01 (+3.45%)
Volume$1.7M
Capitalization343.64M
AFMJF vs TLOFF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFMJF vs. TLOFF commentary
Aug 13, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFMJF is a StrongBuy and TLOFF is a StrongBuy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 13, 2025
Stock price -- (AFMJF: $0.78 vs. TLOFF: $0.30)
Brand notoriety: AFMJF and TLOFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Other Metals/Minerals industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFMJF: 161% vs. TLOFF: 141%
Market capitalization -- AFMJF: $993.22M vs. TLOFF: $343.64M
AFMJF [@Other Metals/Minerals] is valued at $993.22M. TLOFF’s [@Other Metals/Minerals] market capitalization is $343.64M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry ranges from $223.12B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Other Metals/Minerals] industry is $2.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFMJF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileTLOFF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFMJF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • TLOFF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFMJF is a better buy in the long-term than TLOFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFMJF’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TLOFF’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFMJF’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • TLOFF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFMJF is a better buy in the short-term than TLOFF.

Price Growth

AFMJF (@Other Metals/Minerals) experienced а +17.40% price change this week, while TLOFF (@Other Metals/Minerals) price change was +37.61% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Metals/Minerals industry was +3.70%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +9.41%, and the average quarterly price growth was +104.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Other Metals/Minerals (+3.70% weekly)

The category includes companies that explore for, mine and extract metals, such as copper, diamonds, nickel, cobalt ore, lead, zinc and uranium. BHP, Rio Tinto and Southern Copper Corporation are major players in this space.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFMJF($993M) has a higher market cap than TLOFF($344M). TLOFF YTD gains are higher at: 390.196 vs. AFMJF (4.698). AFMJF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 268M vs. TLOFF (-3.47M). TLOFF has more cash in the bank: 9.22M vs. AFMJF (21.1K). TLOFF has less debt than AFMJF: TLOFF (188K) vs AFMJF (73.5M). AFMJF has higher revenues than TLOFF: AFMJF (539M) vs TLOFF (0).
AFMJFTLOFFAFMJF / TLOFF
Capitalization993M344M289%
EBITDA268M-3.47M-7,725%
Gain YTD4.698390.1961%
P/E Ratio8.56N/A-
Revenue539M0-
Total Cash21.1K9.22M0%
Total Debt73.5M188K39,096%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFMJF vs TLOFF: Fundamental Ratings
AFMJF
TLOFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7814
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
4
Undervalued
40
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5276
SMR RATING
1..100
3391
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4334
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
95100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFMJF's Valuation (4) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (40). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is in the same range as TLOFF (76). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's SMR Rating (33) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for TLOFF (91). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew somewhat faster than TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TLOFF's Price Growth Rating (34) in the null industry is in the same range as AFMJF (43). This means that TLOFF’s stock grew similarly to AFMJF’s over the last 12 months.

AFMJF's P/E Growth Rating (95) in the null industry is in the same range as TLOFF (100). This means that AFMJF’s stock grew similarly to TLOFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFMJFTLOFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
89%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
87%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
80%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
90%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
82%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
79%
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
90%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 26 days ago
90%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
83%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
90%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
85%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFMJF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
TLOFF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DSCGX29.800.76
+2.62%
DFA US Small Cap Growth Instl
FTCEX13.78N/A
N/A
Fidelity Advisor Total Intl Equity C
GEGTX82.90N/A
N/A
Columbia Large Cap Growth Inst
BSCMX17.87N/A
N/A
Brandes Small Cap Value I
BKDEX11.10N/A
N/A
BlackRock Defensive Advantage EM K

AFMJF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFMJF has been loosely correlated with LYSDY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AFMJF jumps, then LYSDY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFMJF
1D Price
Change %
AFMJF100%
-0.76%
LYSDY - AFMJF
37%
Loosely correlated
+3.10%
LYSCF - AFMJF
31%
Poorly correlated
+2.78%
RIO - AFMJF
29%
Poorly correlated
+1.54%
BHP - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
+1.37%
BDNNY - AFMJF
28%
Poorly correlated
+2.44%
More

TLOFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that TLOFF and PNPNF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that TLOFF and PNPNF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To TLOFF
1D Price
Change %
TLOFF100%
+1.94%
PNPNF - TLOFF
25%
Poorly correlated
+1.95%
FSUMF - TLOFF
22%
Poorly correlated
+5.78%
IIDDY - TLOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+8.06%
VALE - TLOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.96%
AFMJF - TLOFF
21%
Poorly correlated
-0.76%
More