Ad is loading...
AFNAX vs RWEBX
AFNAX vs RWEBX Comparison
Open Charts AFNAX vs RWEBX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth A
Price$25.18
Change+$0.23 (+0.92%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.84B
American Funds Washington Mutual R2E
Price$63.73
Change+$0.48 (+0.76%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets195.11B
AFNAX vs RWEBX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNAX vs. RWEBX commentary
Jan 31, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNAX is a StrongBuy and RWEBX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWEBX has more cash in the bank: 195B vs. AFNAX (1.84B). AFNAX pays higher dividends than RWEBX: AFNAX (1.67) vs RWEBX (1.07). AFNAX was incepted earlier than RWEBX: AFNAX (13 years) vs RWEBX (10 years). RWEBX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. AFNAX (14.00). RWEBX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNAX: RWEBX (250) vs AFNAX (2500). RWEBX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.08 vs. AFNAX (9.66). RWEBX return over 5 years is better than : 39.18 vs. AFNAX (36.73).
| AFNAX | RWEBX | AFNAX / RWEBX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.645 | 4.202 | 15% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.84B | 195B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.67 | 1.07 | 156% |
| Returns for 1 year | 9.66 | 12.08 | 80% |
| Returns for 3 years | 8.65 | 12.71 | 68% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.73 | 39.18 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.71 | 64.45 | 186% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...