Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNIX vs RWMFX
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFNIX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth I
Price$26.97
Change+$0.06 (+0.22%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.25
Change+$0.23 (+0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. AFNIX (1.8B). AFNIX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: AFNIX (1.78) vs RWMFX (1.41). AFNIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFNIX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AFNIX (0.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFNIX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNIX: RWMFX (250) vs AFNIX (25000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.59 vs. AFNIX (3.32). AFNIX (47.32) and RWMFX (45.02) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AFNIX | RWMFX | AFNIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.63 | 0.31 | 203% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.994 | 8.905 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.78 | 1.41 | 126% |
| Returns for 1 year | 3.32 | 4.59 | 72% |
| Returns for 3 years | 24.78 | 29.92 | 83% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.32 | 45.02 | 105% |
| Returns for 10 years | 142.49 | 72.75 | 196% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement