Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFNIX vs RWMFX
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFNIX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth I
Price$27.08
Change+$0.08 (+0.30%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.77
Change+$0.28 (+0.42%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
AFNIX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFNIX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNIX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. AFNIX (1.83B). AFNIX pays higher dividends than RWMFX: AFNIX (1.76) vs RWMFX (1.42). AFNIX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFNIX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). AFNIX (0.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFNIX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFNIX: RWMFX (250) vs AFNIX (25000). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.12 vs. AFNIX (0.73). AFNIX (51.83) and RWMFX (50.29) have equivalent 5 years return.
| AFNIX | RWMFX | AFNIX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.60 | 0.31 | 194% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 10.559 | 9.760 | 108% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 25000 | 250 | 10,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.76 | 1.42 | 124% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.73 | 4.12 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 36.24 | 41.84 | 87% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.83 | 50.29 | 103% |
| Returns for 10 years | 148.57 | 79.57 | 187% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement