AFNL
Price
$192.54
Change
-$2.46 (-1.26%)
Updated
Sep 18 closing price
Capitalization
31.05M
BHDB
Price
$100.00
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Sep 4 closing price
Capitalization
34.36M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AFNL vs BHDB

Header iconAFNL vs BHDB Comparison
Open Charts AFNL vs BHDBBanner chart's image
Amfin Financial
Price$192.54
Change-$2.46 (-1.26%)
Volume$1
Capitalization31.05M
Bank of Labor Bancshares
Price$100.00
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$696
Capitalization34.36M
AFNL vs BHDB Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFNL vs. BHDB commentary
Sep 26, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNL is a Hold and BHDB is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 26, 2025
Stock price -- (AFNL: $192.54 vs. BHDB: $100.00)
Brand notoriety: AFNL and BHDB are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFNL: 26% vs. BHDB: 223%
Market capitalization -- AFNL: $31.05M vs. BHDB: $34.36M
AFNL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $31.05M. BHDB’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $34.36M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $164.29B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $7.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileBHDB’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).

  • AFNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • BHDB’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
According to our system of comparison, BHDB is a better buy in the long-term than AFNL.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFNL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BHDB’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • BHDB’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFNL is a better buy in the short-term than BHDB.

Price Growth

AFNL (@Regional Banks) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while BHDB (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -0.22%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.00%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.58%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-0.22% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
BHDB($34.4M) has a higher market cap than AFNL($31.1M). BHDB YTD gains are higher at: 127.939 vs. AFNL (4.078).
AFNLBHDBAFNL / BHDB
Capitalization31.1M34.4M90%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD4.078127.9393%
P/E RatioN/A3.94-
RevenueN/A42.4M-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFNL vs BHDB: Fundamental Ratings
AFNL
BHDB
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
9835
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
9
Undervalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
10015
SMR RATING
1..100
10019
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
5140
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
10053
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AFNL's Valuation (9) in the null industry is in the same range as BHDB (17). This means that AFNL’s stock grew similarly to BHDB’s over the last 12 months.

BHDB's Profit vs Risk Rating (15) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFNL (100). This means that BHDB’s stock grew significantly faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

BHDB's SMR Rating (19) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFNL (100). This means that BHDB’s stock grew significantly faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

BHDB's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as AFNL (51). This means that BHDB’s stock grew similarly to AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

BHDB's P/E Growth Rating (53) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AFNL (100). This means that BHDB’s stock grew somewhat faster than AFNL’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFNLBHDB
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
20%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
27%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
20%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
31%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
24%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
26%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 12 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
24%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
34%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
BHDB
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JTTRY15.28N/A
N/A
Japan Airport Terminal
SRKE0.23N/A
N/A
Strake Inc.
DNQAF12.05N/A
N/A
Denali Capital Acquisition Corp.
LOECF0.57N/A
-0.53%
LOGAN ENERGY CORP
PTAIY6.88-0.15
-2.20%
PT Astra International

AFNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AFNL and MBOF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AFNL and MBOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFNL
1D Price
Change %
AFNL100%
N/A
MBOF - AFNL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
RCBC - AFNL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FTFI - AFNL
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
SBNC - AFNL
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.06%
BLFY - AFNL
9%
Poorly correlated
-0.42%
More

BHDB and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that BHDB and CYVF have been poorly correlated (+22% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BHDB and CYVF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To BHDB
1D Price
Change %
BHDB100%
N/A
CYVF - BHDB
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.41%
MBKL - BHDB
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
FFDF - BHDB
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
GVYB - BHDB
20%
Poorly correlated
+2.00%
AFNL - BHDB
8%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More