AFNL
Price
$185.00
Change
-$1.00 (-0.54%)
Updated
Dec 12 closing price
MBOF
Price
$40.00
Change
+$0.40 (+1.01%)
Updated
Dec 13 closing price
Ad is loading...

AFNL vs MBOF

Header iconAFNL vs MBOF Comparison
Open Charts AFNL vs MBOFBanner chart's image
Amfin Financial
Price$185.00
Change-$1.00 (-0.54%)
Volume$2
CapitalizationN/A
MARINE BANCORP FLA
Price$40.00
Change+$0.40 (+1.01%)
Volume$2.26K
CapitalizationN/A
AFNL vs MBOF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFNL vs. MBOF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFNL is a Sell and MBOF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AFNL: $185.00 vs. MBOF: $40.00)
Brand notoriety: AFNL and MBOF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFNL: 2% vs. MBOF: 91%
Market capitalization -- AFNL: $0 vs. MBOF: $0
AFNL [@Regional Banks] is valued at $0. MBOF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFNL’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileMBOF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFNL’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • MBOF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AFNL and MBOF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFNL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while MBOF’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFNL’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • MBOF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFNL is a better buy in the short-term than MBOF.

Price Growth

AFNL (@Regional Banks) experienced а -0.54% price change this week, while MBOF (@Regional Banks) price change was +1.01% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.34%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -1.11%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.80%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.34% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MBOF YTD gains are higher at: 64.948 vs. AFNL (0.000).
AFNLMBOFAFNL / MBOF
CapitalizationN/AN/A-
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD0.00064.948-
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
RevenueN/AN/A-
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/AN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFNL: Fundamental Ratings
AFNL
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
98
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
2
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFNLMBOF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
33%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
10%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
51%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
29%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
27%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
37%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
32%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
30%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
27%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
32%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
25%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
50%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
44%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
36%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
48%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFNL
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
MBOF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PDEQX18.25N/A
N/A
PGIM Jennison Emerging Markets Eq OppsR6
INVTX22.33N/A
N/A
Evolutionary Tree Innovators A
HNISX14.28-0.26
-1.79%
Harbor International Small Cap Retire
LAVFX14.65-0.41
-2.72%
Lord Abbett Fundamental Equity F
JGAQX36.62-1.05
-2.79%
JPMorgan Value Advantage R2

AFNL and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AFNL and MBOF have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AFNL and MBOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFNL
1D Price
Change %
AFNL100%
N/A
MBOF - AFNL
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
HMST - AFNL
24%
Poorly correlated
-6.16%
RCBC - AFNL
21%
Poorly correlated
+1.64%
FTFI - AFNL
21%
Poorly correlated
+2.26%
SBNC - AFNL
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

MBOF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MBOF has been loosely correlated with OAKV. These tickers have moved in lockstep 63% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MBOF jumps, then OAKV could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MBOF
1D Price
Change %
MBOF100%
N/A
OAKV - MBOF
63%
Loosely correlated
N/A
BLMIF - MBOF
46%
Loosely correlated
N/A
RCBC - MBOF
38%
Loosely correlated
+1.64%
AFNL - MBOF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
VBFC - MBOF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More