AFRM
Price
$59.57
Change
-$0.31 (-0.52%)
Updated
Feb 4, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
11.43B
One day until earnings call
PTON
Price
$7.31
Change
-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Updated
Feb 4 closing price
Capitalization
1.57B
One day until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AFRM vs PTON

Header iconAFRM vs PTON Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs PTONBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$59.57
Change-$0.31 (-0.52%)
Volume$82.99K
Capitalization11.43B
Peloton Interactive
Price$7.31
Change-$0.01 (-0.14%)
Volume$8.36M
Capitalization1.57B
AFRM vs PTON Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. PTON commentary
Feb 05, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Buy and PTON is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 05, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $59.53 vs. PTON: $7.31)
Brand notoriety: AFRM: Not notable vs. PTON: Notable
AFRM represents the Packaged Software, while PTON is part of the Recreational Products industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 73% vs. PTON: 72%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $11.43B vs. PTON: $1.57B
AFRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.43B. PTON’s [@Recreational Products] market capitalization is $1.57B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The market cap for tickers in the [@Recreational Products] industry ranges from $63.42B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $11.95B. The average market capitalization across the [@Recreational Products] industry is $5.58B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePTON’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PTON’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than PTON.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PTON’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 6 bearish.
  • PTON’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PTON is a better buy in the short-term than AFRM.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а +3.28% price change this week, while PTON (@Recreational Products) price change was -12.14% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +0.75%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +29.29%.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Recreational Products industry was +0.38%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.82%, and the average quarterly price growth was +4.82%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

PTON is expected to report earnings on May 01, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (+0.75% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

@Recreational Products (+0.38% weekly)

The Leisure and Recreation Products industry includes companies offering recreational goods/services such as video games, swimming pools, golf courses, boats, outdoor spaces etc. Since these are mainly geared towards consumers, strong employment conditions and healthy incomes generally augur well for the recreational products industry. Some of the largest market caps in this space belong to video game developers (e.g. Activision Blizzard, Electronic Arts and Take-two Interactive), and toy /board game makers (like Hasbro).

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($11.4B) has a higher market cap than PTON($1.57B). AFRM YTD gains are higher at: -1.675 vs. PTON (-15.977). AFRM has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): -322M vs. PTON (-643.8M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. PTON (738M). PTON has less debt than AFRM: PTON (2.34B) vs AFRM (6.24B). PTON has higher revenues than AFRM: PTON (2.73B) vs AFRM (1.91B).
AFRMPTONAFRM / PTON
Capitalization11.4B1.57B725%
EBITDA-322M-643.8M50%
Gain YTD-1.675-15.97710%
P/E RatioN/AN/A-
Revenue1.91B2.73B70%
Total Cash1.95B738M264%
Total Debt6.24B2.34B267%
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRMPTON
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
88%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
75%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
88%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
88%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
83%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
87%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
85%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 1 day ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 1 day ago
86%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PTON
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
DBC22.140.17
+0.77%
Invesco DB Commodity Tracking
EZA43.760.01
+0.02%
iShares MSCI South Africa ETF
FDEV28.04-0.28
-0.99%
Fidelity International Multifactor ETF
FOVL72.83-0.75
-1.01%
iShares Focused Value Factor ETF
IJH63.91-0.74
-1.14%
iShares Core S&P Mid-Cap ETF

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-1.95%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
-2.38%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
+1.44%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
+0.93%
COMP - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.38%
XYZ - AFRM
60%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
More