AFRM
Price
$68.55
Change
-$6.06 (-8.12%)
Updated
Feb 21 closing price
Capitalization
11.43B
73 days until earnings call
WWLNF
Price
$7.94
Change
-$1.10 (-12.17%)
Updated
Feb 11 closing price
Capitalization
11.22B
Ad is loading...

AFRM vs WWLNF

Header iconAFRM vs WWLNF Comparison
Open Charts AFRM vs WWLNFBanner chart's image
Affirm Holdings
Price$68.55
Change-$6.06 (-8.12%)
Volume$6.63M
Capitalization11.43B
Worldline SA
Price$7.94
Change-$1.10 (-12.17%)
Volume$157
Capitalization11.22B
AFRM vs WWLNF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFRM vs. WWLNF commentary
Feb 23, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFRM is a Hold and WWLNF is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Feb 23, 2025
Stock price -- (AFRM: $68.55 vs. WWLNF: $7.94)
Brand notoriety: AFRM and WWLNF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Packaged Software industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFRM: 100% vs. WWLNF: 77%
Market capitalization -- AFRM: $11.43B vs. WWLNF: $11.22B
AFRM [@Packaged Software] is valued at $11.43B. WWLNF’s [@Packaged Software] market capitalization is $11.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Packaged Software] industry ranges from $3.15T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Packaged Software] industry is $12.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFRM’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileWWLNF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AFRM’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • WWLNF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, AFRM is a better buy in the long-term than WWLNF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFRM’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AFRM’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 5 bearish.

Price Growth

AFRM (@Packaged Software) experienced а -15.05% price change this week, while WWLNF (@Packaged Software) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was -2.81%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was +26.50%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFRM is expected to report earnings on May 07, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Packaged Software (-2.81% weekly)

Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFRM($11.4B) and WWLNF($11.2B) have the same market capitalization . AFRM YTD gains are higher at: 12.562 vs. WWLNF (-11.778). WWLNF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 907M vs. AFRM (-322M). AFRM has more cash in the bank: 1.95B vs. WWLNF (1.42B). WWLNF has less debt than AFRM: WWLNF (3.58B) vs AFRM (6.24B). WWLNF has higher revenues than AFRM: WWLNF (4.59B) vs AFRM (1.91B).
AFRMWWLNFAFRM / WWLNF
Capitalization11.4B11.2B102%
EBITDA-322M907M-36%
Gain YTD12.562-11.778-107%
P/E RatioN/A42.02-
Revenue1.91B4.59B42%
Total Cash1.95B1.42B137%
Total Debt6.24B3.58B175%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
WWLNF: Fundamental Ratings
WWLNF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
93
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
63
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
74
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFRM
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
78%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
84%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
88%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
86%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
86%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
83%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
87%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
88%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
90%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFRM
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CDDYX35.32-0.34
-0.95%
Columbia Dividend Income Inst3
CRIMX22.91-0.49
-2.09%
CRM Mid Cap Value Instl
JCPRX21.84-0.47
-2.11%
JPMorgan US Large Cap Core Plus R5
STNFX44.39-1.09
-2.40%
Allspring Large Cap Growth Inst
EGWRX17.27-0.76
-4.22%
Allspring Discovery Small Cap Gr R6

AFRM and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFRM has been closely correlated with COIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 81% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFRM jumps, then COIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AFRM
1D Price
Change %
AFRM100%
-8.12%
COIN - AFRM
81%
Closely correlated
-8.27%
CLSK - AFRM
71%
Closely correlated
-8.05%
RIOT - AFRM
70%
Closely correlated
-9.83%
COMP - AFRM
61%
Loosely correlated
-8.18%
HOOD - AFRM
60%
Loosely correlated
-7.96%
More

WWLNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, WWLNF has been loosely correlated with NEXXY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if WWLNF jumps, then NEXXY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To WWLNF
1D Price
Change %
WWLNF100%
N/A
NEXXY - WWLNF
44%
Loosely correlated
-1.72%
FALC - WWLNF
37%
Loosely correlated
N/A
DYNDF - WWLNF
29%
Poorly correlated
-4.49%
ITMSF - WWLNF
28%
Poorly correlated
+0.90%
AFRM - WWLNF
25%
Poorly correlated
-8.12%
More