Ad is loading...
AFSM vs SCHA
AFSM vs SCHA Comparison
Open Charts AFSM vs SCHA
First Trust Active Factor Small Cap ETF
Price$30.75
Change+$0.13 (+0.42%)
Volume$7.16K
Net Assets35.21M
Schwab US Small-Cap ETF™
Price$26.55
Change+$0.12 (+0.45%)
Volume$1.61M
Net Assets18.72B
AFSM vs SCHA Comparison Chart
Loading...
Show more...
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFSM vs. SCHA commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFSM is a Hold and SCHA is a Hold.
SUMMARIES
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCHA has more net assets: 18.7B vs. AFSM (35.2M). SCHA has a higher annual dividend yield than AFSM: SCHA (2.668) vs AFSM (2.227). AFSM was incepted earlier than SCHA: AFSM (5 years) vs SCHA (15 years). AFSM has a higher turnover SCHA (9.00) vs SCHA (9.00).
| AFSM | SCHA | AFSM / SCHA | |
| Gain YTD | 2.227 | 2.668 | 83% |
| Net Assets | 35.2M | 18.7B | 0% |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Turnover | 59.00 | 9.00 | 656% |
| Yield | 0.82 | 1.31 | 62% |
| Fund Existence | 5 years | 15 years | - |
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
| AFSM | SCHA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 88% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 84% | 11 days ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 86% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 83% | 11 days ago 85% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 76% | 11 days ago 83% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 24 days ago 83% | 13 days ago 85% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 85% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 11 days ago 78% | 11 days ago 83% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...
Show more...
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
AFSM and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AFSM has been closely correlated with PIPR. These tickers have moved in lockstep 78% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if AFSM jumps, then PIPR could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AFSM | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AFSM | 100% | +0.43% | ||
| PIPR - AFSM | 78% Closely correlated | +0.61% | ||
| DFH - AFSM | 60% Loosely correlated | +0.08% | ||
| ALKT - AFSM | 56% Loosely correlated | +0.85% | ||
| SLVM - AFSM | 56% Loosely correlated | -1.40% | ||
| ADEA - AFSM | 55% Loosely correlated | +1.25% | ||
More | ||||
SCHA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SCHA has been loosely correlated with THC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 55% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SCHA jumps, then THC could also see price increases.
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SCHA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SCHA | 100% | +0.45% | ||
| THC - SCHA | 55% Loosely correlated | -1.44% | ||
| FIX - SCHA | 46% Loosely correlated | -0.27% | ||
| CNM - SCHA | 45% Loosely correlated | +0.62% | ||
| NTRA - SCHA | 40% Loosely correlated | -6.02% | ||
| TXRH - SCHA | 33% Poorly correlated | +0.35% | ||
More | ||||