Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFTEX vs EMOAX
AFTEX vs EMOAX Comparison
Open Charts AFTEX vs EMOAX
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$12.49
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.92B
Eaton Vance Municipal Opportunities A
Price$11.46
Change-$0.01 (-0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets767.93M
AFTEX vs EMOAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFTEX vs. EMOAX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFTEX is a Hold and EMOAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFTEX has more cash in the bank: 23.9B vs. EMOAX (768M). EMOAX pays higher dividends than AFTEX: EMOAX (3.27) vs AFTEX (3.02). AFTEX was incepted earlier than EMOAX: AFTEX (46 years) vs EMOAX (14 years). EMOAX (0.98) is less costly to investors than AFTEX (0.55). AFTEX initial investment is less costly to investors than EMOAX (3%) vs EMOAX (3%). AFTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than EMOAX: AFTEX (250) vs EMOAX (1000). EMOAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.56 vs. AFTEX (0.31). EMOAX return over 5 years is better than : 3.00 vs. AFTEX (-7.02).
| AFTEX | EMOAX | AFTEX / EMOAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.93 | 59% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.98 | 56% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.807 | 3.912 | 21% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 115% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 1000 | 25% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.9B | 768M | 3,112% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.02 | 3.27 | 92% |
| Returns for 1 year | 0.31 | 3.56 | 9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.06 | 14.50 | 35% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.02 | 3.00 | -234% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.86 | 13.14 | -7% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement