Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFTEX vs GWMTX
AFTEX vs GWMTX Comparison
Open Charts AFTEX vs GWMTX
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$12.41
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.49B
AMG GW&K Municipal Bond N
Price$11.39
Change+$0.01 (+0.09%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets942.96M
AFTEX vs GWMTX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFTEX vs. GWMTX commentary
Sep 16, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFTEX is a Hold and GWMTX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFTEX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. GWMTX (943M). AFTEX pays higher dividends than GWMTX: AFTEX (3.10) vs GWMTX (2.56). AFTEX was incepted earlier than GWMTX: AFTEX (46 years) vs GWMTX (16 years). GWMTX (0.78) is less costly to investors than AFTEX (0.54). GWMTX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 36.00 vs. AFTEX (33.00). AFTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than GWMTX: AFTEX (250) vs GWMTX (2000). GWMTX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.59 vs. AFTEX (-1.29). GWMTX return over 5 years is better than : -1.01 vs. AFTEX (-7.00).
| AFTEX | GWMTX | AFTEX / GWMTX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.71 | 76% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.78 | 69% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 16 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.081 | 3.023 | 3% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 943M | 2,492% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 2.56 | 121% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.29 | 1.59 | -81% |
| Returns for 3 years | 4.13 | 10.09 | 41% |
| Returns for 5 years | -7.00 | -1.01 | 692% |
| Returns for 10 years | -1.12 | 12.52 | -9% |