Ad is loading...
AFTEX vs HMKAX
AFTEX vs HMKAX Comparison
Open Charts AFTEX vs HMKAX
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$12.16
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.53B
Hartford Sustainable Municipal Bond A
Price$9.83
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets76.15M
AFTEX vs HMKAX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFTEX vs. HMKAX commentary
May 10, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFTEX is a Hold and HMKAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFTEX has more cash in the bank: 23.5B vs. HMKAX (76.1M). AFTEX pays higher dividends than HMKAX: AFTEX (3.03) vs HMKAX (2.75). AFTEX was incepted earlier than HMKAX: AFTEX (46 years) vs HMKAX (10 years). HMKAX (0.82) is less costly to investors than AFTEX (0.54). AFTEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 33.00 vs. HMKAX (23.00). HMKAX initial investment is less costly to investors than AFTEX (4%) vs AFTEX (4%). AFTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than HMKAX: AFTEX (250) vs HMKAX (2000). HMKAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.39 vs. AFTEX (-1.24). HMKAX return over 5 years is better than : 4.74 vs. AFTEX (-4.81).
| AFTEX | HMKAX | AFTEX / HMKAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.69 | 78% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.82 | 66% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 10 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.856 | -0.788 | 236% |
| Front Load | 4% | 5% | 83% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2000 | 13% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.5B | 76.1M | 30,880% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.03 | 2.75 | 110% |
| Returns for 1 year | -1.24 | 1.39 | -89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 0.35 | 7.98 | 4% |
| Returns for 5 years | -4.81 | 4.74 | -101% |
| Returns for 10 years | -3.25 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...