Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFTEX vs NMBAX
AFTEX vs NMBAX Comparison
Open Charts AFTEX vs NMBAX
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$12.51
Change+$0.01 (+0.08%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.75B
Nuveen Intermediate Duration Muni Bd A
Price$8.90
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets8.24B
AFTEX vs NMBAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFTEX vs. NMBAX commentary
Oct 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFTEX is a Hold and NMBAX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFTEX has more cash in the bank: 23.8B vs. NMBAX (8.24B). NMBAX (3.08) and AFTEX (3.05) have matching dividends . AFTEX was incepted earlier than NMBAX: AFTEX (46 years) vs NMBAX (30 years). NMBAX (0.64) is less costly to investors than AFTEX (0.55). AFTEX initial investment is less costly to investors than NMBAX (3%) vs NMBAX (3%). AFTEX has a lower initial minimum investment than NMBAX: AFTEX (250) vs NMBAX (2500). NMBAX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 3.17 vs. AFTEX (-0.09). NMBAX return over 5 years is better than : 6.55 vs. AFTEX (-5.76).
| AFTEX | NMBAX | AFTEX / NMBAX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.64 | 86% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.55 | 0.64 | 86% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 30 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 0.888 | 3.902 | 23% |
| Front Load | 4% | 3% | 125% |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 2500 | 10% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.8B | 8.24B | 289% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.05 | 3.08 | 99% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.09 | 3.17 | -3% |
| Returns for 3 years | 6.75 | 14.46 | 47% |
| Returns for 5 years | -5.76 | 6.55 | -88% |
| Returns for 10 years | -0.70 | 17.83 | -4% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement