Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFTEX vs RBCUX
AFTEX vs RBCUX Comparison
Open Charts AFTEX vs RBCUX
American Funds Tax-Exempt Bond A
Price$12.24
Change+$0.07 (+0.58%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets23.07B
Russell Inv Tax-Exempt Bond M
Price$21.65
Change+$0.10 (+0.46%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets6B
AFTEX vs RBCUX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFTEX vs. RBCUX commentary
Sep 06, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFTEX is a Hold and RBCUX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFTEX has more cash in the bank: 23.1B vs. RBCUX (6B). RBCUX pays higher dividends than AFTEX: RBCUX (3.72) vs AFTEX (3.10). AFTEX was incepted earlier than RBCUX: AFTEX (46 years) vs RBCUX (8 years). RBCUX (0.57) is less costly to investors than AFTEX (0.54). RBCUX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 39.00 vs. AFTEX (33.00). RBCUX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFTEX: RBCUX (0) vs AFTEX (250). RBCUX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 1.11 vs. AFTEX (-2.17). RBCUX return over 5 years is better than : 0.00 vs. AFTEX (-8.27).
| AFTEX | RBCUX | AFTEX / RBCUX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.41 | 132% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.54 | 0.57 | 95% |
| Fund Existence | 46 years | 8 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -1.211 | 1.428 | -85% |
| Front Load | 4% | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 250 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 23.1B | 6B | 385% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 3.10 | 3.72 | 83% |
| Returns for 1 year | -2.17 | 1.11 | -195% |
| Returns for 3 years | 2.19 | 9.59 | 23% |
| Returns for 5 years | -8.27 | 0.00 | -623,001% |
| Returns for 10 years | -2.24 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement