AFYA
Price
$19.42
Change
-$0.19 (-0.97%)
Updated
May 12, 04:59 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
1.67B
94 days until earnings call
RGP
Price
$5.61
Change
+$0.16 (+2.94%)
Updated
May 12, 12:51 PM (EDT)
Capitalization
440.97M
66 days until earnings call
Ad is loading...

AFYA vs RGP

Header iconAFYA vs RGP Comparison
Open Charts AFYA vs RGPBanner chart's image
Afya
Price$19.42
Change-$0.19 (-0.97%)
Volume$5.04K
Capitalization1.67B
Resources Connection
Price$5.61
Change+$0.16 (+2.94%)
Volume$201
Capitalization440.97M
AFYA vs RGP Comparison Chart
Loading...
AFYA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AFYA vs. RGP commentary
May 12, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYA is a Hold and RGP is a StrongBuy.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
May 12, 2025
Stock price -- (AFYA: $19.61 vs. RGP: $5.45)
Brand notoriety: AFYA and RGP are both not notable
Both companies represent the Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AFYA: 181% vs. RGP: 49%
Market capitalization -- AFYA: $1.67B vs. RGP: $440.97M
AFYA [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] is valued at $1.67B. RGP’s [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] market capitalization is $440.97M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry ranges from $80.94B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Miscellaneous Commercial Services] industry is $5.48B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AFYA’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileRGP’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AFYA’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • RGP’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, RGP is a better buy in the long-term than AFYA.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AFYA’s TA Score shows that 5 TA indicator(s) are bullish while RGP’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AFYA’s TA Score: 5 bullish, 4 bearish.
  • RGP’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AFYA is a better buy in the short-term than RGP.

Price Growth

AFYA (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) experienced а +2.56% price change this week, while RGP (@Miscellaneous Commercial Services) price change was -6.36% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Miscellaneous Commercial Services industry was +3.50%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +15.51%, and the average quarterly price growth was +5.18%.

Reported Earning Dates

AFYA is expected to report earnings on Aug 14, 2025.

RGP is expected to report earnings on Jul 17, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Miscellaneous Commercial Services (+3.50% weekly)

The sector produces general business services, and are not classified elsewhere. For example, FleetCor Technologies provides fuel cards and workforce payment products and services; Copart, Inc. provides online vehicle auction and remarketing services across various nations; Equifax Inc. collects and aggregates credit information on consumers and businesses worldwide, along with selling credit monitoring and fraud-prevention services. Many of the companies in this category have multi-billion market capitalizations.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AFYA($1.67B) has a higher market cap than RGP($441M). AFYA has higher P/E ratio than RGP: AFYA (23.72) vs RGP (16.42). AFYA YTD gains are higher at: 25.095 vs. RGP (-34.991). AFYA has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 1.06B vs. RGP (46.1M). RGP has less debt than AFYA: RGP (16.5M) vs AFYA (2.83B). AFYA has higher revenues than RGP: AFYA (2.73B) vs RGP (705M).
AFYARGPAFYA / RGP
Capitalization1.67B441M378%
EBITDA1.06B46.1M2,302%
Gain YTD25.095-34.991-72%
P/E Ratio23.7216.42144%
Revenue2.73B705M387%
Total Cash822MN/A-
Total Debt2.83B16.5M17,139%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AFYA vs RGP: Fundamental Ratings
AFYA
RGP
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
174
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
87
Overvalued
3
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
90100
SMR RATING
1..100
5194
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4387
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
8416
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
95n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

RGP's Valuation (3) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFYA (87). This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than AFYA’s over the last 12 months.

AFYA's Profit vs Risk Rating (90) in the null industry is in the same range as RGP (100). This means that AFYA’s stock grew similarly to RGP’s over the last 12 months.

AFYA's SMR Rating (51) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (94). This means that AFYA’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

AFYA's Price Growth Rating (43) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for RGP (87). This means that AFYA’s stock grew somewhat faster than RGP’s over the last 12 months.

RGP's P/E Growth Rating (16) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AFYA (84). This means that RGP’s stock grew significantly faster than AFYA’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AFYARGP
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
70%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
82%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
69%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
83%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
66%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
62%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
77%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
60%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 6 days ago
74%
Bullish Trend 11 days ago
65%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 8 days ago
80%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
63%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
81%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
50%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AFYA
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
RGP
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
EPGFX12.630.28
+2.27%
EuroPac Gold A
VMCCX50.590.05
+0.10%
Virtus KAR Mid-Cap Core C
JDBAX45.16-0.04
-0.09%
Janus Henderson Balanced A
MWOKX62.71-0.09
-0.14%
MFS Global Growth R6
EGWCX9.73-0.06
-0.61%
Allspring Discovery Small Cap Gr C

RGP and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, RGP has been loosely correlated with FC. These tickers have moved in lockstep 61% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if RGP jumps, then FC could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To RGP
1D Price
Change %
RGP100%
-3.20%
FC - RGP
61%
Loosely correlated
-1.08%
GHC - RGP
52%
Loosely correlated
-0.42%
BCO - RGP
50%
Loosely correlated
-0.68%
CASS - RGP
48%
Loosely correlated
-0.94%
AZZ - RGP
48%
Loosely correlated
+0.79%
More