Ad is loading...
AFYCX vs FXAIX
AFYCX vs FXAIX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs FXAIX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$23.38
Change+$1.31 (+5.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
AFYCX vs FXAIX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. FXAIX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Buy and FXAIX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FXAIX has more cash in the bank: 598B vs. AFYCX (1.63B). FXAIX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: FXAIX (1.30) vs AFYCX (0.90). AFYCX was incepted earlier than FXAIX: AFYCX (12 years) vs FXAIX (14 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than FXAIX (0.01). AFYCX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 12.00 vs. FXAIX (2.00). FXAIX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: FXAIX (0) vs AFYCX (2500). FXAIX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -3.10 vs. AFYCX (-7.65). FXAIX return over 5 years is better than : 92.75 vs. AFYCX (36.92).
| AFYCX | FXAIX | AFYCX / FXAIX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.01 | 10,667% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.01 | 10,667% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 14 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.587 | -15.000 | 64% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 0 | - |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 598B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.30 | 69% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.65 | -3.10 | 247% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.23 | 16.20 | -32% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.92 | 92.75 | 40% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.34 | 159.34 | 49% |