Ad is loading...
AFYCX vs RWMEX
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMEX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$23.38
Change+$1.31 (+5.94%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.63B
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$59.30
Change+$4.25 (+7.72%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets167.99B
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMEX commentary
Apr 11, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Buy and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 168B vs. AFYCX (1.63B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMEX (1.26) vs AFYCX (0.90). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: AFYCX (12 years) vs RWMEX (23 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.61). RWMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 31.00 vs. AFYCX (12.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMEX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). AFYCX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : -7.65 vs. RWMEX (-8.52). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.22 vs. AFYCX (36.92).
| AFYCX | RWMEX | AFYCX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.61 | 262% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.61 | 262% |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | -9.587 | -9.579 | 100% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.63B | 168B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.90 | 1.26 | 72% |
| Returns for 1 year | -7.65 | -8.52 | 90% |
| Returns for 3 years | -5.23 | -3.37 | 155% |
| Returns for 5 years | 36.92 | 43.22 | 85% |
| Returns for 10 years | 77.34 | 40.51 | 191% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...