Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMEX
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMEX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$26.40
Change-$0.16 (-0.60%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$65.84
Change-$0.38 (-0.57%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets207.3B
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMEX commentary
Sep 27, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMEX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. AFYCX (1.87B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMEX (1.18) vs AFYCX (0.91). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMEX (23 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.60). RWMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (12.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMEX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 5.05 vs. AFYCX (1.87). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 54.61 vs. AFYCX (51.29).
| AFYCX | RWMEX | AFYCX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.60 | 267% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.60 | 267% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.138 | 8.797 | 104% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.91 | 1.18 | 77% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.87 | 5.05 | 37% |
| Returns for 3 years | 33.23 | 43.70 | 76% |
| Returns for 5 years | 51.29 | 54.61 | 94% |
| Returns for 10 years | 140.80 | 90.58 | 155% |