Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMEX
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMEX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$26.55
Change+$0.06 (+0.23%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.79B
American Funds Washington Mutual R4
Price$65.71
Change+$0.22 (+0.34%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets203.68B
AFYCX vs RWMEX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMEX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMEX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMEX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. AFYCX (1.8B). RWMEX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMEX (1.16) vs AFYCX (0.89). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMEX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMEX (24 years). AFYCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RWMEX (0.60). RWMEX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (21.00). RWMEX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMEX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMEX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.22 vs. AFYCX (2.21). RWMEX return over 5 years is better than : 43.13 vs. AFYCX (39.92).
| AFYCX | RWMEX | AFYCX / RWMEX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.60 | 272% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.60 | 272% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.020 | 8.582 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.16 | 76% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.21 | 4.22 | 52% |
| Returns for 3 years | 20.92 | 28.68 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.92 | 43.13 | 93% |
| Returns for 10 years | 119.32 | 70.13 | 170% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement