Ad is loading...
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$24.87
Change+$0.08 (+0.32%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.87B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$62.97
Change+$0.49 (+0.78%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets193.4B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Jan 19, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 193B vs. AFYCX (1.87B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.70) vs AFYCX (1.01). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (12 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 30.00 vs. AFYCX (14.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 12.39 vs. AFYCX (11.36). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 35.03 vs. AFYCX (29.55).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Fund Existence | 12 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 1.593 | 2.340 | 68% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.87B | 193B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 1.01 | 1.70 | 59% |
| Returns for 1 year | 11.36 | 12.39 | 92% |
| Returns for 3 years | 5.97 | 11.20 | 53% |
| Returns for 5 years | 29.55 | 35.03 | 84% |
| Returns for 10 years | 103.30 | 65.23 | 158% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Ad is loading...