Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$26.49
Change-$0.12 (-0.45%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.8B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$66.02
Change-$0.23 (-0.35%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets204.42B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Nov 20, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 204B vs. AFYCX (1.8B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.41) vs AFYCX (0.89). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMFX (24 years). AFYCX (1.63) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.02 vs. AFYCX (2.52). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 43.78 vs. AFYCX (39.92).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.31 | 526% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.63 | 0.31 | 526% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 24 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.514 | 8.527 | 112% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.8B | 204B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.89 | 1.41 | 63% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.52 | 4.02 | 63% |
| Returns for 3 years | 21.47 | 29.47 | 73% |
| Returns for 5 years | 39.92 | 43.78 | 91% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.31 | 72.15 | 167% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement