Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AFYCX vs RWMFX
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison
Open Charts AFYCX vs RWMFX
Bahl & Gaynor Income Growth C
Price$26.84
Change+$0.18 (+0.68%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets1.83B
American Funds Washington Mutual R5
Price$67.30
Change+$0.53 (+0.79%)
VolumeN/A
Net Assets206.71B
AFYCX vs RWMFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AFYCX vs. RWMFX commentary
Oct 21, 2025
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AFYCX is a Hold and RWMFX is a StrongBuy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
RWMFX has more cash in the bank: 207B vs. AFYCX (1.83B). RWMFX pays higher dividends than AFYCX: RWMFX (1.42) vs AFYCX (0.87). AFYCX was incepted earlier than RWMFX: AFYCX (13 years) vs RWMFX (23 years). AFYCX (1.60) is less costly to investors than RWMFX (0.31). RWMFX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 29.00 vs. AFYCX (21.00). RWMFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AFYCX: RWMFX (250) vs AFYCX (2500). RWMFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 4.82 vs. AFYCX (-0.45). RWMFX return over 5 years is better than : 53.69 vs. AFYCX (47.07).
| AFYCX | RWMFX | AFYCX / RWMFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 1.60 | 0.31 | 516% |
| Fund Existence | 13 years | 23 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 9.684 | 10.631 | 91% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 2500 | 250 | 1,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 1.83B | 207B | 1% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.87 | 1.42 | 61% |
| Returns for 1 year | -0.45 | 4.82 | -9% |
| Returns for 3 years | 32.33 | 41.37 | 78% |
| Returns for 5 years | 47.07 | 53.69 | 88% |
| Returns for 10 years | 120.99 | 76.74 | 158% |