AGBIF vs SDZNY
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGBIF is a Hold and SDZNY is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGBIF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSDZNY’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
- AGBIF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- SDZNY’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
SDZNY’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- SDZNY’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
Price Growth
AGBIF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SDZNY (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -1.52% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was -5.07%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -7.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -11.90%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Pharmaceuticals: Other (-5.07% weekly)Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.
| AGBIF | SDZNY | AGBIF / SDZNY | |
| Capitalization | 23.9M | 11.4B | 0% |
| EBITDA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Gain YTD | 100.000 | 43.612 | 229% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
| Revenue | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Cash | N/A | N/A | - |
| Total Debt | N/A | N/A | - |
| SDZNY | |
|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 33% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 75% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 60% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 25% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 45% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 79% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 73% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 12 days ago 53% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 3 days ago 70% |
| 1 Day | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| ETFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
| SRLN | 41.86 | N/A | N/A |
| SPDR® Blackstone Senior Loan ETF | |||
| REVS | 26.24 | -0.01 | -0.05% |
| Columbia Research Enhanced Value ETF | |||
| IYT | 72.98 | -0.11 | -0.15% |
| iShares Transportation Average ETF | |||
| CZA | 109.48 | -0.45 | -0.41% |
| Invesco Zacks Mid-Cap ETF | |||
| ESMV | 28.84 | -0.30 | -1.04% |
| iShares ESG MSCI USA Min Vol Factor ETF | |||
AGBIF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AGBIF and SEHCF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGBIF and SEHCF's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGBIF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGBIF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SEHCF - AGBIF | 23% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| CBSTF - AGBIF | 14% Poorly correlated | -4.42% | ||
| SDZNY - AGBIF | 13% Poorly correlated | +1.70% | ||
| TSNDF - AGBIF | 13% Poorly correlated | +4.59% | ||
| CLSH - AGBIF | 11% Poorly correlated | -0.17% | ||
More | ||||
SDZNY and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, SDZNY has been loosely correlated with SDZXF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 44% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if SDZNY jumps, then SDZXF could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To SDZNY | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| SDZNY | 100% | +1.70% | ||
| SDZXF - SDZNY | 44% Loosely correlated | -1.76% | ||
| CPHRF - SDZNY | 21% Poorly correlated | -0.51% | ||
| TAK - SDZNY | 21% Poorly correlated | +0.37% | ||
| AVDL - SDZNY | 20% Poorly correlated | -5.87% | ||
| APNHY - SDZNY | 20% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||