Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCSX vs FSFWX
AGCSX vs FSFWX Comparison
Open Charts AGCSX vs FSFWX
AGCSX vs FSFWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCSX vs. FSFWX commentary
Sep 13, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCSX is a Hold and FSFWX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
FSFWX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. AGCSX (58.7M). FSFWX (0.87) and AGCSX (0.84) have matching dividends . AGCSX was incepted earlier than FSFWX: AGCSX (10 years) vs FSFWX (6 years). AGCSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than FSFWX (0.70). AGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. FSFWX (41.00). FSFWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCSX: FSFWX (250) vs AGCSX (5000000). FSFWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 9.35 vs. AGCSX (2.49). FSFWX return over 5 years is better than : -7.78 vs. AGCSX (-10.48).
| AGCSX | FSFWX | AGCSX / FSFWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.70 | 130% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 6 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 5.299 | 12.534 | 42% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.7M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.87 | 98% |
| Returns for 1 year | 2.49 | 9.35 | 27% |
| Returns for 3 years | 38.10 | 38.84 | 98% |
| Returns for 5 years | -10.48 | -7.78 | 135% |
| Returns for 10 years | 114.20 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers