Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCSX vs SCWFX
AGCSX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts AGCSX vs SCWFX
AGCSX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCSX vs. SCWFX commentary
Sep 23, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCSX is a StrongBuy and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.4B vs. AGCSX (58.3M). AGCSX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: AGCSX (0.84) vs SCWFX (0.56). AGCSX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: AGCSX (10 years) vs SCWFX (26 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than AGCSX (0.91). AGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCSX: SCWFX (250) vs AGCSX (5000000). SCWFX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 8.90 vs. AGCSX (1.65). SCWFX return over 5 years is better than : -8.82 vs. AGCSX (-11.17).
| AGCSX | SCWFX | AGCSX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 26 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 4.865 | 12.285 | 40% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 58.3M | 91.4B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.84 | 0.56 | 151% |
| Returns for 1 year | 1.65 | 8.90 | 18% |
| Returns for 3 years | 42.40 | 41.95 | 101% |
| Returns for 5 years | -11.17 | -8.82 | 127% |
| Returns for 10 years | 105.22 | 76.84 | 137% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers