Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCSX vs SCWFX
AGCSX vs SCWFX Comparison
Open Charts AGCSX vs SCWFX
AGCSX vs SCWFX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCSX vs. SCWFX commentary
Jun 24, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCSX is a Buy and SCWFX is a Buy.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SCWFX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCSX (66.7M). AGCSX pays higher dividends than SCWFX: AGCSX (0.81) vs SCWFX (0.59). AGCSX was incepted earlier than SCWFX: AGCSX (10 years) vs SCWFX (25 years). SCWFX (1.07) is less costly to investors than AGCSX (0.91). AGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. SCWFX (41.00). SCWFX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCSX: SCWFX (250) vs AGCSX (5000000). AGCSX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.03 vs. SCWFX (19.97). AGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 0.43 vs. SCWFX (-4.33).
| AGCSX | SCWFX | AGCSX / SCWFX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 1.07 | 85% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 25 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 14.981 | 14.228 | 105% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 250 | 2,000,000% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 66.7M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.59 | 136% |
| Returns for 1 year | 21.03 | 19.97 | 105% |
| Returns for 3 years | 52.76 | 39.36 | 134% |
| Returns for 5 years | 0.43 | -4.33 | -10% |
| Returns for 10 years | 145.43 | 99.13 | 147% |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers