Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
AGCSX vs SFCWX
AGCSX vs SFCWX Comparison
Open Charts AGCSX vs SFCWX
AGCSX vs SFCWX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
AGCSX vs. SFCWX commentary
Jun 19, 2026
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGCSX is a Hold and SFCWX is a Hold.
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
SFCWX has more cash in the bank: 91.5B vs. AGCSX (65M). SFCWX pays higher dividends than AGCSX: SFCWX (0.92) vs AGCSX (0.81). AGCSX was incepted earlier than SFCWX: AGCSX (10 years) vs SFCWX (9 years). AGCSX (0.91) is less costly to investors than SFCWX (0.65). AGCSX is a more actively managed with annual turnover of: 140.00 vs. SFCWX (41.00). SFCWX has a lower initial minimum investment than AGCSX: SFCWX (1000000) vs AGCSX (5000000). SFCWX annual gain was more profitable for investors over the last year : 21.52 vs. AGCSX (19.25). AGCSX return over 5 years is better than : 2.11 vs. SFCWX (0.31).
| AGCSX | SFCWX | AGCSX / SFCWX | |
| Total Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Annual Report Gross Expense Ratio | 0.91 | 0.65 | 140% |
| Fund Existence | 10 years | 9 years | - |
| Gain YTD | 12.042 | 14.295 | 84% |
| Front Load | N/A | N/A | - |
| Min. Initial Investment | 5000000 | 1000000 | 500% |
| Min. Initial Investment IRA | N/A | N/A | - |
| Net Assets | 65M | 91.5B | 0% |
| Annual Yield % from dividends | 0.81 | 0.92 | 87% |
| Returns for 1 year | 19.25 | 21.52 | 89% |
| Returns for 3 years | 44.82 | 37.57 | 119% |
| Returns for 5 years | 2.11 | 0.31 | 683% |
| Returns for 10 years | 135.44 | N/A | - |
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
VS
Interact to see
Advertisement
Advertisement
Interesting Tickers