AGFMF
Price
$9.26
Change
-$0.06 (-0.64%)
Updated
Sep 5 closing price
Capitalization
596.26M
AJMPF
Price
$2.42
Change
+$0.11 (+4.78%)
Updated
Aug 25 closing price
Capitalization
1.5B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGFMF vs AJMPF

Header iconAGFMF vs AJMPF Comparison
Open Charts AGFMF vs AJMPFBanner chart's image
AGF Management
Price$9.26
Change-$0.06 (-0.64%)
Volume$100
Capitalization596.26M
Ashmore Group
Price$2.42
Change+$0.11 (+4.78%)
Volume$1K
Capitalization1.5B
AGFMF vs AJMPF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AGFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AJMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGFMF vs. AJMPF commentary
Sep 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGFMF is a StrongBuy and AJMPF is a Buy.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Sep 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AGFMF: $9.26 vs. AJMPF: $2.41)
Brand notoriety: AGFMF and AJMPF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGFMF: 8% vs. AJMPF: 32%
Market capitalization -- AGFMF: $596.26M vs. AJMPF: $1.5B
AGFMF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $596.26M. AJMPF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $1.5B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $170.21B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $7.5B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGFMF’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileAJMPF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGFMF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • AJMPF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGFMF is a better buy in the long-term than AJMPF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGFMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while AJMPF’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGFMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • AJMPF’s TA Score: 3 bullish, 2 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, AGFMF is a better buy in the short-term than AJMPF.

Price Growth

AGFMF (@Investment Managers) experienced а +3.81% price change this week, while AJMPF (@Investment Managers) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was -0.32%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +2.75%, and the average quarterly price growth was +21.27%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (-0.32% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AJMPF($1.5B) has a higher market cap than AGFMF($596M). AJMPF has higher P/E ratio than AGFMF: AJMPF (15.27) vs AGFMF (8.24). AGFMF YTD gains are higher at: 24.295 vs. AJMPF (21.393). AGFMF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 150M vs. AJMPF (107M). AJMPF has more cash in the bank: 696M vs. AGFMF (49.7M). AJMPF has less debt than AGFMF: AJMPF (6M) vs AGFMF (165M). AGFMF has higher revenues than AJMPF: AGFMF (535M) vs AJMPF (174M).
AGFMFAJMPFAGFMF / AJMPF
Capitalization596M1.5B40%
EBITDA150M107M140%
Gain YTD24.29521.393114%
P/E Ratio8.2415.2754%
Revenue535M174M307%
Total Cash49.7M696M7%
Total Debt165M6M2,750%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGFMF vs AJMPF: Fundamental Ratings
AGFMF
AJMPF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7730
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
27
Undervalued
6
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
23100
SMR RATING
1..100
7360
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4446
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
2026
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5075

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AJMPF's Valuation (6) in the null industry is in the same range as AGFMF (27). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

AGFMF's Profit vs Risk Rating (23) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AJMPF (100). This means that AGFMF’s stock grew significantly faster than AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AJMPF's SMR Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as AGFMF (73). This means that AJMPF’s stock grew similarly to AGFMF’s over the last 12 months.

AGFMF's Price Growth Rating (44) in the null industry is in the same range as AJMPF (46). This means that AGFMF’s stock grew similarly to AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

AGFMF's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the null industry is in the same range as AJMPF (26). This means that AGFMF’s stock grew similarly to AJMPF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGFMFAJMPF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
39%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
40%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
40%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
56%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
31%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
29%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
33%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
68%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 27 days ago
48%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
44%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
30%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGFMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
AJMPF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FCBSX35.47N/A
N/A
Franklin Mutual U.S. Mid Cap Value C
PKSCX38.46N/A
N/A
Virtus KAR Small-Cap Core C
HBLTX15.17N/A
N/A
Hartford Balanced Income R5
LLGLX14.91N/A
N/A
Longleaf Partners Global
LZFIX8.92N/A
N/A
Lazard Equity Franchise Inst Shr

AGFMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGFMF has been loosely correlated with MAIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 37% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGFMF jumps, then MAIN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGFMF
1D Price
Change %
AGFMF100%
-0.64%
MAIN - AGFMF
37%
Loosely correlated
-0.11%
PNNT - AGFMF
34%
Loosely correlated
-0.28%
HLNE - AGFMF
31%
Poorly correlated
-0.63%
JHG - AGFMF
31%
Poorly correlated
-1.82%
GCAAF - AGFMF
30%
Poorly correlated
+0.04%
More

AJMPF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AJMPF and AZIHF have been poorly correlated (+13% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AJMPF and AZIHF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AJMPF
1D Price
Change %
AJMPF100%
N/A
AZIHF - AJMPF
13%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - AJMPF
2%
Poorly correlated
-0.64%
AABVF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BRSGF - AJMPF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - AJMPF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More