AGGZF vs CYJBF
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGGZF is a Hold and CYJBF is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGGZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileCYJBF’s FA Score has 3 green FA rating(s).
- AGGZF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- CYJBF’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
Price Growth
AGGZF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а -0.32% price change this week, while CYJBF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -0.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.58%, and the average quarterly price growth was -3.60%.
Industries' Descriptions
@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery (-0.24% weekly)The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
| AGGZF | CYJBF | AGGZF / CYJBF | |
| Capitalization | 779M | 3.07B | 25% |
| EBITDA | 94.8M | 469M | 20% |
| Gain YTD | 1.126 | 59.675 | 2% |
| P/E Ratio | 70.42 | 21.60 | 326% |
| Revenue | 1.51B | 4.55B | 33% |
| Total Cash | 72.9M | 338M | 22% |
| Total Debt | 948M | 843M | 112% |
AGGZF | CYJBF | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 47 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 94 Overvalued | 14 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 74 | 31 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 68 | 13 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 62 | 54 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 13 | 87 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 85 | 30 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
CYJBF's Valuation (14) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AGGZF (94). This means that CYJBF’s stock grew significantly faster than AGGZF’s over the last 12 months.
CYJBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (31) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGGZF (74). This means that CYJBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGGZF’s over the last 12 months.
CYJBF's SMR Rating (13) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGGZF (68). This means that CYJBF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGGZF’s over the last 12 months.
CYJBF's Price Growth Rating (54) in the null industry is in the same range as AGGZF (62). This means that CYJBF’s stock grew similarly to AGGZF’s over the last 12 months.
AGGZF's P/E Growth Rating (13) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CYJBF (87). This means that AGGZF’s stock grew significantly faster than CYJBF’s over the last 12 months.
| RSI ODDS (%) |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) |
| Momentum ODDS (%) |
| MACD ODDS (%) |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) |
| Advances ODDS (%) |
| Declines ODDS (%) |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) |
| Aroon ODDS (%) |
AGGZF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AGGZF and ASTE have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGGZF and ASTE's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGGZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGGZF | 100% | N/A | ||
| ASTE - AGGZF | 26% Poorly correlated | +2.83% | ||
| EPIAF - AGGZF | 20% Poorly correlated | -2.30% | ||
| NKLA - AGGZF | 8% Poorly correlated | -7.69% | ||
| SHYF - AGGZF | 6% Poorly correlated | +3.05% | ||
| GP - AGGZF | 6% Poorly correlated | -1.57% | ||
More | ||||
CYJBF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CYJBF has been loosely correlated with SHZNY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 35% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CYJBF jumps, then SHZNY could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To CYJBF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CYJBF | 100% | N/A | ||
| SHZNY - CYJBF | 35% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| AGGZF - CYJBF | 2% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| VRRM - CYJBF | 0% Poorly correlated | +0.54% | ||
| AMMX - CYJBF | -0% Poorly correlated | +2.99% | ||
| AUHEF - CYJBF | -0% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More | ||||