It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGGZF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileVRRM’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
VRRM’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
AGGZF (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) experienced а +7.01% price change this week, while VRRM (@Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery) price change was -2.24% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Trucks/Construction/Farm Machinery industry was -3.04%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -3.15%, and the average quarterly price growth was -4.26%.
VRRM is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
The industry designs and builds agricultural, construction and other large commercial and transportation equipment. Tractors, planters and harvesters, as well as rock-crushing, railroad, demolition and other construction implements are produced by this industry. Rapid urbanization and industrialization has been bolstering the expansion of the construction sector in the past few decades, thereby boosting demand for heavy equipment businesses. Caterpillar Inc., Deere & Company and Cummins Inc (Ex. Cummins Engine Inc) are some prominent companies in this industry.
AGGZF | VRRM | AGGZF / VRRM | |
Capitalization | 779M | 4.06B | 19% |
EBITDA | 94.8M | 287M | 33% |
Gain YTD | -2.488 | -1.520 | 164% |
P/E Ratio | 70.42 | 67.97 | 104% |
Revenue | 1.51B | 817M | 185% |
Total Cash | 72.9M | 136M | 54% |
Total Debt | 948M | 1.07B | 88% |
AGGZF | VRRM | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | 59 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 93 Overvalued | 87 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 71 | 42 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 65 | 41 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 58 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 8 | 79 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 25 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
VRRM's Valuation (87) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AGGZF (93) in the null industry. This means that VRRM’s stock grew similarly to AGGZF’s over the last 12 months.
VRRM's Profit vs Risk Rating (42) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AGGZF (71) in the null industry. This means that VRRM’s stock grew similarly to AGGZF’s over the last 12 months.
VRRM's SMR Rating (41) in the Financial Conglomerates industry is in the same range as AGGZF (65) in the null industry. This means that VRRM’s stock grew similarly to AGGZF’s over the last 12 months.
AGGZF's Price Growth Rating (58) in the null industry is in the same range as VRRM (63) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AGGZF’s stock grew similarly to VRRM’s over the last 12 months.
AGGZF's P/E Growth Rating (8) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for VRRM (79) in the Financial Conglomerates industry. This means that AGGZF’s stock grew significantly faster than VRRM’s over the last 12 months.
VRRM | |
---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 1 day ago83% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago68% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago67% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago61% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago56% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 13 days ago75% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 5 days ago61% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago86% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago47% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
JSVAX | 31.43 | 0.14 | +0.45% |
Janus Henderson Contrarian T | |||
ZDIVX | 27.53 | 0.10 | +0.36% |
Zacks Dividend Investor | |||
MPSIX | 25.73 | 0.05 | +0.19% |
Principal MidCap S&P 400 Index Inst | |||
GCSIX | 32.01 | N/A | N/A |
Goldman Sachs Small Cap Eq Insghts Instl | |||
CMIRX | 7.59 | -0.05 | -0.65% |
Conestoga Discovery Institutional |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AGGZF and ASTE have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGGZF and ASTE's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGGZF | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AGGZF | 100% | +0.79% | ||
ASTE - AGGZF | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.30% | ||
EPIAF - AGGZF | 20% Poorly correlated | -3.20% | ||
EPOKY - AGGZF | 9% Poorly correlated | +0.78% | ||
VRRM - AGGZF | 7% Poorly correlated | -3.16% | ||
NKLA - AGGZF | 6% Poorly correlated | -13.68% | ||
More |