It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGL’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileBACK’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGL’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while BACK’s TA Score has 5 bullish TA indicator(s).
AGL (@Medical/Nursing Services) experienced а -4.76% price change this week, while BACK (@Medical/Nursing Services) price change was -3.33% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical/Nursing Services industry was -3.85%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.90%, and the average quarterly price growth was +1.66%.
AGL is expected to report earnings on Feb 26, 2025.
BACK is expected to report earnings on Nov 16, 2023.
The medical/nursing services includes companies that provide medical-related services such as ambulance services, dialysis centers, respiratory therapy, blood testing and rehabilitation services. DaVita Inc., Chemed Corporation and Guardant Health, Inc. are examples of companies in this industry.
AGL | BACK | AGL / BACK | |
Capitalization | 2.5B | 3.31M | 75,400% |
EBITDA | -167.64M | -17.33M | 967% |
Gain YTD | -84.064 | -47.511 | 177% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | N/A | - |
Revenue | 4.32B | 10.7M | 40,336% |
Total Cash | 488M | 247K | 197,571% |
Total Debt | 49.5M | 2.08M | 2,375% |
BACK | ||
---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 61 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 63 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 95 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AGL | BACK | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago73% | N/A |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago86% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago80% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago85% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago84% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 6 days ago80% | 14 days ago85% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 22 days ago90% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 6 days ago76% | 2 days ago90% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago90% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGL has been loosely correlated with ASTH. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGL jumps, then ASTH could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGL | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AGL | 100% | -8.68% | ||
ASTH - AGL | 49% Loosely correlated | -3.47% | ||
AMN - AGL | 48% Loosely correlated | -3.96% | ||
CCRN - AGL | 35% Loosely correlated | -0.17% | ||
HCSG - AGL | 28% Poorly correlated | -4.61% | ||
BKD - AGL | 28% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor tells us that BACK and HCSG have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that BACK and HCSG's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To BACK | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
BACK | 100% | +0.88% | ||
HCSG - BACK | 21% Poorly correlated | -4.61% | ||
AGL - BACK | 20% Poorly correlated | -8.68% | ||
BKDT - BACK | 12% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
AVAH - BACK | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.82% | ||
AMS - BACK | 10% Poorly correlated | -3.14% | ||
More |