AGNMF
Price
$0.10
Change
-$0.03 (-23.08%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
129.56M
PAX
Price
$13.70
Change
+$0.17 (+1.26%)
Updated
Jul 25 closing price
Capitalization
2.2B
5 days until earnings call
Interact to see
Advertisement

AGNMF vs PAX

Header iconAGNMF vs PAX Comparison
Open Charts AGNMF vs PAXBanner chart's image
AGRONOMICS
Price$0.10
Change-$0.03 (-23.08%)
Volume$340K
Capitalization129.56M
Patria Investments
Price$13.70
Change+$0.17 (+1.26%)
Volume$301.44K
Capitalization2.2B
AGNMF vs PAX Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGNMF vs. PAX commentary
Jul 27, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGNMF is a Hold and PAX is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 27, 2025
Stock price -- (AGNMF: $0.10 vs. PAX: $13.70)
Brand notoriety: AGNMF and PAX are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGNMF: 270% vs. PAX: 55%
Market capitalization -- AGNMF: $129.56M vs. PAX: $2.2B
AGNMF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $129.56M. PAX’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $2.2B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.22B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGNMF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whilePAX’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGNMF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • PAX’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the long-term than AGNMF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGNMF’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while PAX’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGNMF’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
  • PAX’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 4 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, PAX is a better buy in the short-term than AGNMF.

Price Growth

AGNMF (@Investment Managers) experienced а -14.35% price change this week, while PAX (@Investment Managers) price change was -1.23% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +0.66%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +8.49%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.57%.

Reported Earning Dates

PAX is expected to report earnings on Nov 11, 2025.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+0.66% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
PAX($2.2B) has a higher market cap than AGNMF($130M). PAX has higher P/E ratio than AGNMF: PAX (18.37) vs AGNMF (5.36). AGNMF YTD gains are higher at: 104.918 vs. PAX (20.768). PAX has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 143M vs. AGNMF (-4.97M). AGNMF has more cash in the bank: 163M vs. PAX (12.8M). PAX has higher revenues than AGNMF: PAX (307M) vs AGNMF (0).
AGNMFPAXAGNMF / PAX
Capitalization130M2.2B6%
EBITDA-4.97M143M-3%
Gain YTD104.91820.768505%
P/E Ratio5.3618.3729%
Revenue0307M-
Total Cash163M12.8M1,273%
Total DebtN/A15.6M-
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGNMFPAX
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
77%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
86%
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
52%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 19 days ago
69%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
68%
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 10 days ago
85%
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
68%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
70%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
59%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AGNMF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
PAX
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
JMVYX38.260.15
+0.39%
JPMorgan Mid Cap Value R6
IVHIX5.990.02
+0.34%
Macquarie High Income Fund Class I
PGJAX18.110.04
+0.22%
PGIM Jennison Global Infrastructure A
PSCMX17.060.02
+0.12%
Putnam Small Cap Value R6
EEMCX13.62-0.02
-0.15%
Columbia Emerging Markets C

AGNMF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGNMF and ENFD have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGNMF and ENFD's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGNMF
1D Price
Change %
AGNMF100%
-21.57%
ENFD - AGNMF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
KROEF - AGNMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-12.90%
VINP - AGNMF
9%
Poorly correlated
-1.91%
OFSTF - AGNMF
7%
Poorly correlated
+1.16%
PAX - AGNMF
6%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
More

PAX and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, PAX has been closely correlated with BN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 67% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if PAX jumps, then BN could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To PAX
1D Price
Change %
PAX100%
+1.26%
BN - PAX
67%
Closely correlated
+0.22%
CG - PAX
66%
Loosely correlated
+1.83%
OWL - PAX
64%
Loosely correlated
-1.43%
SEIC - PAX
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.22%
APAM - PAX
64%
Loosely correlated
+0.32%
More