AGRPY
Price
$21.86
Change
-$0.18 (-0.82%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
MZTFF
Price
$34.68
Change
-$1.57 (-4.33%)
Updated
Dec 8 closing price
Ad is loading...

AGRPY vs MZTFF

Header iconAGRPY vs MZTFF Comparison
Open Charts AGRPY vs MZTFFBanner chart's image
Absa Group
Price$21.86
Change-$0.18 (-0.82%)
Volume$297
CapitalizationN/A
Mizrahi Tefahot Bank
Price$34.68
Change-$1.57 (-4.33%)
Volume$243
CapitalizationN/A
AGRPY vs MZTFF Comparison Chart
Loading...
AGRPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGRPY vs. MZTFF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGRPY is a Buy and MZTFF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AGRPY: $21.85 vs. MZTFF: $34.68)
Brand notoriety: AGRPY and MZTFF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Regional Banks industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGRPY: 56% vs. MZTFF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AGRPY: $8.87B vs. MZTFF: $9.22B
AGRPY [@Regional Banks] is valued at $8.87B. MZTFF’s [@Regional Banks] market capitalization is $9.22B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Regional Banks] industry ranges from $133.96B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Regional Banks] industry is $5.88B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGRPY’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileMZTFF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AGRPY’s FA Score: 3 green, 2 red.
  • MZTFF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGRPY is a better buy in the long-term than MZTFF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGRPY’s TA Score shows that 6 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • AGRPY’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AGRPY (@Regional Banks) experienced а -1.82% price change this week, while MZTFF (@Regional Banks) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Regional Banks industry was -3.08%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.84%, and the average quarterly price growth was +20.19%.

Reported Earning Dates

AGRPY is expected to report earnings on Nov 27, 2024.

Industries' Descriptions

@Regional Banks (-3.08% weekly)

Regional banks have a smaller reach than major banks, and cater mostly to one region of a country, such as a state or within a group of states. They offer services often similar – albeit with some limitations/smaller scale – compared to major banks. Taking deposits, making loans, mortgages, leases, credit cards , fund management, insurance and investment banking. SunTrust Banks, State Street Corp., M&T Bank Corp. are some examples of U.S. regional banks.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
MZTFF($9.22B) and AGRPY($8.87B) have the same market capitalization . MZTFF has higher P/E ratio than AGRPY: MZTFF (9.81) vs AGRPY (7.95). AGRPY YTD gains are higher at: 38.880 vs. MZTFF (0.000). AGRPY has higher revenues than MZTFF: AGRPY (98.1B) vs MZTFF (13.9B).
AGRPYMZTFFAGRPY / MZTFF
Capitalization8.87B9.22B96%
EBITDAN/AN/A-
Gain YTD38.8800.000-
P/E Ratio7.959.8181%
Revenue98.1B13.9B706%
Total CashN/AN/A-
Total DebtN/A34.6B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGRPY vs MZTFF: Fundamental Ratings
AGRPY
MZTFF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
7543
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
25
Undervalued
46
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
521
SMR RATING
1..100
15
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4069
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
22100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
5030

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

AGRPY's Valuation (25) in the null industry is in the same range as MZTFF (46). This means that AGRPY’s stock grew similarly to MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

MZTFF's Profit vs Risk Rating (1) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGRPY (52). This means that MZTFF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGRPY’s over the last 12 months.

AGRPY's SMR Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as MZTFF (5). This means that AGRPY’s stock grew similarly to MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

AGRPY's Price Growth Rating (40) in the null industry is in the same range as MZTFF (69). This means that AGRPY’s stock grew similarly to MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

AGRPY's P/E Growth Rating (22) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for MZTFF (100). This means that AGRPY’s stock grew significantly faster than MZTFF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGRPYMZTFF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
69%
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
70%
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
73%
N/A
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
62%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
62%
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
68%
N/A
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AGRPY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
GGOAX12.98N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Growth A
VWILX115.59-0.24
-0.21%
Vanguard International Growth Adm
HSUCX33.78-0.14
-0.41%
Rational Dynamic Brands C
NMSAX23.70-0.33
-1.37%
Columbia Small Cap Index A
QGRPX17.80-0.65
-3.50%
UBS US Quality Growth At Rsnbl Prc P

AGRPY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGRPY has been loosely correlated with SGBLY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 34% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGRPY jumps, then SGBLY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGRPY
1D Price
Change %
AGRPY100%
-0.82%
SGBLY - AGRPY
34%
Loosely correlated
-2.11%
NDBKY - AGRPY
32%
Poorly correlated
-1.98%
CKHGY - AGRPY
29%
Poorly correlated
-1.51%
MZTFF - AGRPY
24%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AVAL - AGRPY
22%
Poorly correlated
+1.20%
More

MZTFF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, MZTFF has been loosely correlated with BPCGF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 39% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if MZTFF jumps, then BPCGF could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To MZTFF
1D Price
Change %
MZTFF100%
N/A
BPCGF - MZTFF
39%
Loosely correlated
N/A
CFIC - MZTFF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CZNL - MZTFF
24%
Poorly correlated
+0.55%
AGRPY - MZTFF
24%
Poorly correlated
-0.82%
USMT - MZTFF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More