Advertisement
AGS vs EFAA
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGS is a Buy and EFAA is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGS’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green while.
- AGS’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGS’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.
- AGS’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
AGS (@Casinos/Gaming) experienced а 0.00% price change this weekfor the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Casinos/Gaming industry was -1.55%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.21%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.89%.
Reported Earning Dates
AGS is expected to report earnings on Aug 01, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Casinos/Gaming (-1.55% weekly)Casinos/Gaming includes companies that operate casinos, gaming services, horse racing and harness racing facilities. Think Las Vegas Sands Corp., MGM Resorts International and Wynn Resorts, Ltd. In periods of strong economic growth, consumers tend to spend on discretionary/leisure activities like gambling or games; but consumption is likely to slow down when there’s economic sluggishness.
AGS | ||
|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 50 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 49 Fair valued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 30 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 19 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 53 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
| AGS | EFAA | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 70% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 68% | 1 day ago 90% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 69% | 1 day ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 62% | 1 day ago 70% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 61% | 1 day ago 54% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 11 days ago 90% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 56% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 90% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 51% | N/A |
Advertisement
AGS and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGS has been loosely correlated with EVRI. These tickers have moved in lockstep 33% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGS jumps, then EVRI could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGS | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AGS | 100% | N/A | ||
| EVRI - AGS | 33% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
| PENN - AGS | 29% Poorly correlated | -1.44% | ||
| HGV - AGS | 28% Poorly correlated | -0.74% | ||
| CZR - AGS | 24% Poorly correlated | -3.75% | ||
| WYNN - AGS | 24% Poorly correlated | -1.01% | ||
More | ||||
EFAA and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, EFAA has been closely correlated with CON. These tickers have moved in lockstep 92% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is a high statistical probability that if EFAA jumps, then CON could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To EFAA | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| EFAA | 100% | -0.10% | ||
| CON - EFAA | 92% Closely correlated | -2.45% | ||
| AGS - EFAA | 32% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| RAND - EFAA | 16% Poorly correlated | -0.65% | ||
| FER - EFAA | 11% Poorly correlated | +0.16% | ||
| BNR - EFAA | 10% Poorly correlated | -1.56% | ||
More | ||||