It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AGYS’s FA Score shows that 3 FA rating(s) are green whileOLO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AGYS’s TA Score shows that 3 TA indicator(s) are bullish while OLO’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).
AGYS (@Packaged Software) experienced а +2.40% price change this week, while OLO (@Packaged Software) price change was +2.23% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Packaged Software industry was +4.41%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +10.45%, and the average quarterly price growth was +19.48%.
AGYS is expected to report earnings on Jan 28, 2025.
OLO is expected to report earnings on Feb 19, 2025.
Packaged software comprises multiple software programs bundled together and sold as a group. For example, Microsoft Office includes multiple applications such as Excel, Word, and PowerPoint. In some cases, buying a bundled product is cheaper than purchasing each item individually[s20] . Microsoft Corporation, Oracle Corp. and Adobe are some major American packaged software makers.
AGYS | OLO | AGYS / OLO | |
Capitalization | 2.31B | 889M | 259% |
EBITDA | 23.5M | -47.56M | -49% |
Gain YTD | 62.804 | 36.538 | 172% |
P/E Ratio | 26.19 | 9.87 | 265% |
Revenue | 228M | 228M | 100% |
Total Cash | 116M | 363M | 32% |
Total Debt | 24.1M | 18.9M | 128% |
AGYS | OLO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 83 | 19 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 69 Overvalued | 6 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 4 | 91 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 20 | 90 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 39 | 37 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 20 | 100 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | n/a |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
OLO's Valuation (6) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AGYS (69) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AGYS’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS's Profit vs Risk Rating (4) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLO (91) in the null industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew significantly faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS's SMR Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLO (90) in the null industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew significantly faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.
OLO's Price Growth Rating (37) in the null industry is in the same range as AGYS (39) in the Packaged Software industry. This means that OLO’s stock grew similarly to AGYS’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS's P/E Growth Rating (20) in the Packaged Software industry is significantly better than the same rating for OLO (100) in the null industry. This means that AGYS’s stock grew significantly faster than OLO’s over the last 12 months.
AGYS | OLO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago69% | 2 days ago90% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago89% | 2 days ago84% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago74% | N/A |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago77% | 2 days ago76% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago75% | 2 days ago70% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 8 days ago77% | 2 days ago76% |
Declines ODDS (%) | about 1 month ago76% | N/A |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago78% | 2 days ago87% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago72% | 2 days ago73% |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, AGYS has been loosely correlated with TREIF. These tickers have moved in lockstep 45% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if AGYS jumps, then TREIF could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AGYS | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AGYS | 100% | -0.60% | ||
TREIF - AGYS | 45% Loosely correlated | +13.59% | ||
DJCO - AGYS | 45% Loosely correlated | +1.05% | ||
SPSC - AGYS | 44% Loosely correlated | -0.29% | ||
ACIW - AGYS | 42% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
OLO - AGYS | 41% Loosely correlated | +1.17% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, OLO has been loosely correlated with ACIW. These tickers have moved in lockstep 53% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if OLO jumps, then ACIW could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To OLO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
OLO | 100% | +1.17% | ||
ACIW - OLO | 53% Loosely correlated | +0.02% | ||
SDGR - OLO | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.89% | ||
EEFT - OLO | 50% Loosely correlated | +0.55% | ||
EVCM - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | -0.35% | ||
COMP - OLO | 49% Loosely correlated | N/A | ||
More |