AGZNF
Price
$10.25
Change
-$0.60 (-5.53%)
Updated
Dec 20 closing price
CEBUY
Price
$1.85
Change
-$0.30 (-13.95%)
Updated
Nov 5 closing price
Ad is loading...

AGZNF vs CEBUY

Header iconAGZNF vs CEBUY Comparison
Open Charts AGZNF vs CEBUYBanner chart's image
AEGEAN Airlines
Price$10.25
Change-$0.60 (-5.53%)
Volume$1.2K
CapitalizationN/A
Cebu Air
Price$1.85
Change-$0.30 (-13.95%)
Volume$100
CapitalizationN/A
AGZNF vs CEBUY Comparison Chart
Loading...
AGZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEBUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AGZNF vs. CEBUY commentary
Dec 26, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AGZNF is a Hold and CEBUY is a Hold.

Ad is loading...
COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 26, 2024
Stock price -- (AGZNF: $10.25 vs. CEBUY: $1.85)
Brand notoriety: AGZNF and CEBUY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Airlines industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AGZNF: 416% vs. CEBUY: 100%
Market capitalization -- AGZNF: $938.52M vs. CEBUY: $296.53M
AGZNF [@Airlines] is valued at $938.52M. CEBUY’s [@Airlines] market capitalization is $296.53M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Airlines] industry ranges from $40.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Airlines] industry is $6.96B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AGZNF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCEBUY’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AGZNF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CEBUY’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, AGZNF is a better buy in the long-term than CEBUY.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AGZNF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CEBUY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AGZNF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CEBUY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CEBUY is a better buy in the short-term than AGZNF.

Price Growth

AGZNF (@Airlines) experienced а -5.49% price change this week, while CEBUY (@Airlines) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Airlines industry was +4.46%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +3.67%, and the average quarterly price growth was +12.90%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Airlines (+4.46% weekly)

Airlines industry comprises passenger air transportation, including scheduled and non-scheduled routes. This can include charter airlines, as well as regular commuter ones. Discount pricing and the rise of low-cost carriers over recent decades have expanded the industry by making its services accessible to a much larger global population, compared to the older days when airline travel was a relative luxury for many people in the world. Delta Air Lines Inc., Southwest Airlines Co and United Continental Holdings, Inc. are some of the airlines with the largest stock market capitalizations in the U.S.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AGZNF($939M) has a higher market cap than CEBUY($297M). AGZNF has higher P/E ratio than CEBUY: AGZNF (580.69) vs CEBUY (3.99). AGZNF YTD gains are higher at: -28.221 vs. CEBUY (-49.454).
AGZNFCEBUYAGZNF / CEBUY
Capitalization939M297M316%
EBITDAN/A27.5B-
Gain YTD-28.221-49.45457%
P/E Ratio580.693.9914,537%
RevenueN/A98.2B-
Total CashN/A17.4B-
Total DebtN/A161B-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AGZNF vs CEBUY: Fundamental Ratings
AGZNF
CEBUY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
90
Overvalued
59
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
81100
SMR RATING
1..100
2612
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7860
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
199
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CEBUY's Valuation (59) in the null industry is in the same range as AGZNF (90). This means that CEBUY’s stock grew similarly to AGZNF’s over the last 12 months.

AGZNF's Profit vs Risk Rating (81) in the null industry is in the same range as CEBUY (100). This means that AGZNF’s stock grew similarly to CEBUY’s over the last 12 months.

CEBUY's SMR Rating (12) in the null industry is in the same range as AGZNF (26). This means that CEBUY’s stock grew similarly to AGZNF’s over the last 12 months.

CEBUY's Price Growth Rating (60) in the null industry is in the same range as AGZNF (78). This means that CEBUY’s stock grew similarly to AGZNF’s over the last 12 months.

AGZNF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for CEBUY (99). This means that AGZNF’s stock grew significantly faster than CEBUY’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AGZNFCEBUY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
Bullish Trend 7 days ago
41%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
33%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
44%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
18%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
39%
Bullish Trend 3 days ago
15%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
55%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
38%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AGZNF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CEBUY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
CLNN5.000.28
+5.93%
Clene Inc.
HIVE3.130.16
+5.39%
HIVE Digital Technologies Ltd
VRN4.930.10
+2.07%
Veren Inc.
MMI38.400.59
+1.56%
Marcus & Millichap
OKE102.191.22
+1.21%
Oneok

AGZNF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AGZNF and RYAOF have been poorly correlated (+23% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AGZNF and RYAOF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AGZNF
1D Price
Change %
AGZNF100%
N/A
RYAOF - AGZNF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ELALF - AGZNF
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AFRAF - AGZNF
14%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZFF - AGZNF
1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CEBUY - AGZNF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CEBUY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that CEBUY and ALNPY have been poorly correlated (+4% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that CEBUY and ALNPY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CEBUY
1D Price
Change %
CEBUY100%
N/A
ALNPY - CEBUY
4%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIABF - CEBUY
2%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AIRYY - CEBUY
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZLY - CEBUY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
ANZFF - CEBUY
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More