AHCHF
Price
$2.41
Change
-$0.15 (-5.86%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
CBUMY
Price
$23.11
Change
+$0.40 (+1.76%)
Updated
Dec 17 closing price
Ad is loading...

AHCHF vs CBUMY

Header iconAHCHF vs CBUMY Comparison
Open Charts AHCHF vs CBUMYBanner chart's image
Anhui Conch Cement
Price$2.41
Change-$0.15 (-5.86%)
Volume$734
CapitalizationN/A
China National Buildings Material
Price$23.11
Change+$0.40 (+1.76%)
Volume$110
CapitalizationN/A
AHCHF vs CBUMY Comparison Chart
Loading...
AHCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBUMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHCHF vs. CBUMY commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHCHF is a Hold and CBUMY is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AHCHF: $2.41 vs. CBUMY: $23.11)
Brand notoriety: AHCHF and CBUMY are both not notable
Both companies represent the Construction Materials industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHCHF: 48% vs. CBUMY: 2%
Market capitalization -- AHCHF: $19.17B vs. CBUMY: $5.3B
AHCHF [@Construction Materials] is valued at $19.17B. CBUMY’s [@Construction Materials] market capitalization is $5.3B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Construction Materials] industry ranges from $59.37B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Construction Materials] industry is $8.95B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHCHF’s FA Score shows that 2 FA rating(s) are green whileCBUMY’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AHCHF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
  • CBUMY’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AHCHF and CBUMY are a good buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHCHF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CBUMY’s TA Score has 2 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHCHF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 8 bearish.
  • CBUMY’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 5 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CBUMY is a better buy in the short-term than AHCHF.

Price Growth

AHCHF (@Construction Materials) experienced а -16.03% price change this week, while CBUMY (@Construction Materials) price change was -2.87% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Construction Materials industry was -3.73%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +0.16%, and the average quarterly price growth was +8.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Construction Materials (-3.73% weekly)

Many naturally occurring substances, such as clay, rocks, sand, and wood, even twigs and leaves have been used in construction material. Many man-made products are also in use. Vulcan Materials Co., Martin Marietta Materials, Inc. and Owens Corning Inc. are examples of construction material companies in the U.S. Performance of companies that extract or produce construction materials could at times depend on demand for residential and commercial buildings/real estate, and therefore in some cases could feel impacted by economic cycles.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHCHF($19.2B) has a higher market cap than CBUMY($5.3B). AHCHF has higher P/E ratio than CBUMY: AHCHF (8.14) vs CBUMY (4.58). CBUMY YTD gains are higher at: 29.135 vs. AHCHF (4.555). CBUMY has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 39.8B vs. AHCHF (17.3B). CBUMY has higher revenues than AHCHF: CBUMY (230B) vs AHCHF (138B).
AHCHFCBUMYAHCHF / CBUMY
Capitalization19.2B5.3B362%
EBITDA17.3B39.8B43%
Gain YTD4.55529.13516%
P/E Ratio8.144.58178%
Revenue138B230B60%
Total Cash69.9BN/A-
Total Debt22.3BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHCHF vs CBUMY: Fundamental Ratings
AHCHF
CBUMY
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5592
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
19
Undervalued
5
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
83100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4838
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
131
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
8550

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CBUMY's Valuation (5) in the null industry is in the same range as AHCHF (19). This means that CBUMY’s stock grew similarly to AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMY's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AHCHF (100). This means that CBUMY’s stock grew similarly to AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

AHCHF's SMR Rating (83) in the null industry is in the same range as CBUMY (100). This means that AHCHF’s stock grew similarly to CBUMY’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMY's Price Growth Rating (38) in the null industry is in the same range as AHCHF (48). This means that CBUMY’s stock grew similarly to AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

CBUMY's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is in the same range as AHCHF (13). This means that CBUMY’s stock grew similarly to AHCHF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHCHFCBUMY
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
73%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
75%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
82%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
85%
MACD
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
55%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
74%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
71%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 14 days ago
55%
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
63%
Bearish Trend 3 days ago
70%
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
84%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
76%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
44%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
AHCHF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CBUMY
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
OEQAX7.64N/A
N/A
Oaktree Emerging Markets Equity A
PNAIX76.13-0.26
-0.34%
T. Rowe Price All-Cap Opportunities-I
ESERX36.89-0.16
-0.43%
Eaton Vance Atlanta Capital Sel Eq R6
VICEX20.90-0.15
-0.71%
USA Mutuals Vice Investor
AUENX20.79-4.67
-18.35%
AQR Large Cap Defensive Style N

AHCHF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHCHF and AHCHY have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHCHF and AHCHY's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHCHF
1D Price
Change %
AHCHF100%
-5.86%
AHCHY - AHCHF
32%
Poorly correlated
-2.00%
CARCY - AHCHF
27%
Poorly correlated
N/A
XYIGY - AHCHF
25%
Poorly correlated
+0.05%
CBUMY - AHCHF
18%
Poorly correlated
+1.74%
BZZUY - AHCHF
5%
Poorly correlated
-0.98%
More

CBUMY and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CBUMY has been loosely correlated with XYIGY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 51% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CBUMY jumps, then XYIGY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CBUMY
1D Price
Change %
CBUMY100%
+1.74%
XYIGY - CBUMY
51%
Loosely correlated
+0.05%
AHCHY - CBUMY
47%
Loosely correlated
-2.00%
CARCY - CBUMY
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CMTOY - CBUMY
20%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CBUMF - CBUMY
18%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More