Advertisement
AHEXF vs TNET
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHEXF is a Hold and TNET is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHEXF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileTNET’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).
- AHEXF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- TNET’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHEXF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while TNET’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AHEXF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 1 bearish.
- TNET’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 2 bearish.
Price Growth
AHEXF (@Other Consumer Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while TNET (@Other Consumer Services) price change was +2.80% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Other Consumer Services industry was +4.24%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.19%, and the average quarterly price growth was -5.30%.
Reported Earning Dates
TNET is expected to report earnings on Oct 22, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Other Consumer Services (+4.24% weekly)Other consumer services include companies that provide consumer services, and are not classified elsewhere. Travel fare aggregators, hotel bookings, consumer-to-consumer or business-to-business sales platforms are some examples of services that can be clubbed into this category. Many of such services have expanded online. Booking Holdings Inc, The Priceline Group Inc, and eBay Inc. are some major operators in this segment.
| AHEXF | TNET | AHEXF / TNET | |
| Capitalization | 5.41B | 3.18B | 170% |
| EBITDA | 732M | 328M | 223% |
| Gain YTD | 15.932 | -27.281 | -58% |
| P/E Ratio | 14.64 | 22.30 | 66% |
| Revenue | 23B | 5.06B | 455% |
| Total Cash | 344M | 407M | 85% |
| Total Debt | 3.56B | 1.04B | 344% |
AHEXF | TNET | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 48 | 65 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 17 Undervalued | 88 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 94 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 75 | 12 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 49 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 66 | 18 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 65 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AHEXF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for TNET (88) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AHEXF’s stock grew significantly faster than TNET’s over the last 12 months.
TNET's Profit vs Risk Rating (94) in the Data Processing Services industry is in the same range as AHEXF (100) in the null industry. This means that TNET’s stock grew similarly to AHEXF’s over the last 12 months.
TNET's SMR Rating (12) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHEXF (75) in the null industry. This means that TNET’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHEXF’s over the last 12 months.
AHEXF's Price Growth Rating (49) in the null industry is in the same range as TNET (64) in the Data Processing Services industry. This means that AHEXF’s stock grew similarly to TNET’s over the last 12 months.
TNET's P/E Growth Rating (18) in the Data Processing Services industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHEXF (66) in the null industry. This means that TNET’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHEXF’s over the last 12 months.
| AHEXF | TNET | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 65% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 28% | 2 days ago 63% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 73% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 30% | 2 days ago 63% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 64% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 27% | 2 days ago 60% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | N/A | 4 days ago 65% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | N/A | 2 days ago 64% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | N/A | 3 days ago 75% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago 15% | 2 days ago 72% |
Advertisement
AHEXF and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHEXF and KELYB have been poorly correlated (+12% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHEXF and KELYB's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AHEXF | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHEXF | 100% | N/A | ||
| KELYB - AHEXF | 12% Poorly correlated | -1.35% | ||
| BGSF - AHEXF | 8% Poorly correlated | +1.40% | ||
| IPDN - AHEXF | 7% Poorly correlated | +0.90% | ||
| NSP - AHEXF | 5% Poorly correlated | -2.22% | ||
| TNET - AHEXF | 3% Poorly correlated | -0.98% | ||
More | ||||
TNET and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, TNET has been loosely correlated with NSP. These tickers have moved in lockstep 57% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if TNET jumps, then NSP could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To TNET | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TNET | 100% | -0.98% | ||
| NSP - TNET | 57% Loosely correlated | -2.22% | ||
| BBSI - TNET | 53% Loosely correlated | -1.41% | ||
| RHI - TNET | 51% Loosely correlated | +0.22% | ||
| HSII - TNET | 42% Loosely correlated | -0.54% | ||
| KFY - TNET | 41% Loosely correlated | -1.08% | ||
More | ||||