AHFCF
Price
$0.52
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 5 closing price
Capitalization
12.93M
ASXSF
Price
$0.26
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Jun 30 closing price
Capitalization
9.87M
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHFCF vs ASXSF

Header iconAHFCF vs ASXSF Comparison
Open Charts AHFCF vs ASXSFBanner chart's image
Flow Cap
Price$0.52
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$651
Capitalization12.93M
Elysee Development
Price$0.26
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$5K
Capitalization9.87M
AHFCF vs ASXSF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
ASXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHFCF vs. ASXSF commentary
Jul 06, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHFCF is a Hold and ASXSF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Jul 06, 2025
Stock price -- (AHFCF: $0.52 vs. ASXSF: $0.26)
Brand notoriety: AHFCF and ASXSF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Investment Managers industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHFCF: 100% vs. ASXSF: 106%
Market capitalization -- AHFCF: $12.93M vs. ASXSF: $9.87M
AHFCF [@Investment Managers] is valued at $12.93M. ASXSF’s [@Investment Managers] market capitalization is $9.87M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Investment Managers] industry ranges from $124.17B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Investment Managers] industry is $6.16B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHFCF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileASXSF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AHFCF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • ASXSF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, ASXSF is a better buy in the long-term than AHFCF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

ASXSF’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • ASXSF’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 4 bearish.

Price Growth

AHFCF (@Investment Managers) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while ASXSF (@Investment Managers) price change was +0.65% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Investment Managers industry was +2.17%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.54%, and the average quarterly price growth was +10.33%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Investment Managers (+2.17% weekly)

Investment Managers manage financial assets and other investments of clients. Management includes designing a short- or long-term strategy for buying/holding and selling of portfolio holdings. It can also include tax services and other aspects of financial planning as well. While it is perceived that the industry is faced with growing competition from robo-advisors/digital platforms and passive/ index-tracking funds, many investors still find value in actively managed in-person services that investment management companies often emphasize on. At the same time, many wealth managers are also incorporating digital initiatives/low cost options in addition to their in-person customized services. Their main sources of revenues are fees as a percentage of assets under management, in addition to a certain portion of clients’ gains from asset appreciation. BlackRock, Inc., Blackstone Group Inc and Brookfield Asset Management are some of the major investment management companies.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHFCF($12.9M) has a higher market cap than ASXSF($9.87M). ASXSF has higher P/E ratio than AHFCF: ASXSF (18.90) vs AHFCF (1.51). ASXSF YTD gains are higher at: 27.404 vs. AHFCF (-13.333). AHFCF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 6.79M vs. ASXSF (-2.48M). AHFCF has more cash in the bank: 13.1M vs. ASXSF (11.7M). AHFCF has higher revenues than ASXSF: AHFCF (7.72M) vs ASXSF (492K).
AHFCFASXSFAHFCF / ASXSF
Capitalization12.9M9.87M131%
EBITDA6.79M-2.48M-274%
Gain YTD-13.33327.404-49%
P/E Ratio1.5118.908%
Revenue7.72M492K1,569%
Total Cash13.1M11.7M112%
Total Debt17.7MN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHFCF vs ASXSF: Fundamental Ratings
AHFCF
ASXSF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
5050
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
89
Overvalued
26
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
5291
SMR RATING
1..100
9049
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
7645
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
198
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a75

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

ASXSF's Valuation (26) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHFCF (89). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHFCF’s over the last 12 months.

AHFCF's Profit vs Risk Rating (52) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for ASXSF (91). This means that AHFCF’s stock grew somewhat faster than ASXSF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXSF's SMR Rating (49) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHFCF (90). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHFCF’s over the last 12 months.

ASXSF's Price Growth Rating (45) in the null industry is in the same range as AHFCF (76). This means that ASXSF’s stock grew similarly to AHFCF’s over the last 12 months.

AHFCF's P/E Growth Rating (1) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for ASXSF (98). This means that AHFCF’s stock grew significantly faster than ASXSF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHFCFASXSF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
74%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
64%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
67%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
32%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
65%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
29%
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
63%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 4 days ago
79%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 4 days ago
89%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
ASXSF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NODK13.120.36
+2.82%
NI Holdings
ICL7.310.10
+1.39%
ICL Group Ltd
ATNM1.440.01
+0.70%
Actinium Pharmaceuticals
LADR11.030.02
+0.18%
LADDER CAPITAL Corp
NVO69.17-0.65
-0.93%
Novo-Nordisk A/S

AHFCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHFCF and LRFC have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHFCF and LRFC's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHFCF
1D Price
Change %
AHFCF100%
N/A
LRFC - AHFCF
25%
Poorly correlated
-0.48%
SFES - AHFCF
20%
Poorly correlated
+1.26%
SII - AHFCF
13%
Poorly correlated
+2.24%
BMNM - AHFCF
9%
Poorly correlated
-16.52%
AGFMF - AHFCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
More

ASXSF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that ASXSF and RESCU have been poorly correlated (+21% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that ASXSF and RESCU's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To ASXSF
1D Price
Change %
ASXSF100%
N/A
RESCU - ASXSF
21%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AGFMF - ASXSF
18%
Poorly correlated
-2.64%
AABVF - ASXSF
11%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHFCF - ASXSF
0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AMDUF - ASXSF
-1%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More