Advertisement
AHG vs FINV
To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHG is a Hold and FINV is a Hold.
Long-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileFINV’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
- AHG’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
- FINV’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
Short-Term Analysis
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHG’s TA Score shows that 2 TA indicator(s) are bullish while FINV’s TA Score has 4 bullish TA indicator(s).
- AHG’s TA Score: 2 bullish, 6 bearish.
- FINV’s TA Score: 4 bullish, 5 bearish.
Price Growth
AHG (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -7.14% price change this week, while FINV (@Savings Banks) price change was -4.53% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was -0.87%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.37%, and the average quarterly price growth was +13.24%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Savings Banks industry was +0.63%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.10%, and the average quarterly price growth was +49.96%.
Reported Earning Dates
FINV is expected to report earnings on Nov 24, 2025.
Industries' Descriptions
@Medical Distributors (-0.87% weekly)Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
@Savings Banks (+0.63% weekly)A savings bank primary function is to take deposits and paying interest on those deposits. Originating in Europe during the 18th century, these banks were generally introduced to incentivize people of all stripes to save money and park them with banks. By the 1990s, the internet ushered in online savings banks that allowed savers to deposit/transact with banks digitally, without requiring to visit a branch office. Savings banks have potentially encouraged lower-income population to save and have access to a financial institution to earn interest on their money. New York Community Bancorp, Inc, Webster Financial Corporation, Washington Federal, Inc. are examples of savings banks.
| AHG | FINV | AHG / FINV | |
| Capitalization | 900M | 1.81B | 50% |
| EBITDA | -15.16M | 3.1B | -0% |
| Gain YTD | 14.706 | 9.432 | 156% |
| P/E Ratio | N/A | 4.79 | - |
| Revenue | 2.22M | 13.8B | 0% |
| Total Cash | 47.4M | 7.89B | 1% |
| Total Debt | 350K | 1.14B | 0% |
AHG | FINV | ||
|---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 54 | 8 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 67 Overvalued | 15 Undervalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 44 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 48 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 44 | 64 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 64 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | 75 | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
FINV's Valuation (15) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHG (67) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHG’s over the last 12 months.
FINV's Profit vs Risk Rating (44) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHG (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHG’s over the last 12 months.
FINV's SMR Rating (48) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHG (98) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that FINV’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHG’s over the last 12 months.
AHG's Price Growth Rating (44) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as FINV (64) in the null industry. This means that AHG’s stock grew similarly to FINV’s over the last 12 months.
AHG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is somewhat better than the same rating for FINV (64) in the null industry. This means that AHG’s stock grew somewhat faster than FINV’s over the last 12 months.
| AHG | FINV | |
|---|---|---|
| RSI ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 75% |
| Stochastic ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 77% |
| Momentum ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 61% |
| MACD ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 72% |
| TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 69% |
| TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 67% |
| Advances ODDS (%) | 10 days ago 88% | 7 days ago 82% |
| Declines ODDS (%) | 7 days ago 88% | 9 days ago 72% |
| BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 1 day ago 90% | 1 day ago 71% |
| Aroon ODDS (%) | N/A | 1 day ago 81% |
Advertisement
AHG and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHG and FINV have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHG and FINV's prices will move in lockstep.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AHG | 100% | -4.29% | ||
| FINV - AHG | 25% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| LPRO - AHG | 23% Poorly correlated | +0.99% | ||
| PRG - AHG | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.20% | ||
| RWAY - AHG | 22% Poorly correlated | N/A | ||
| LC - AHG | 21% Poorly correlated | +2.34% | ||
More | ||||
FINV and
Correlation & Price change
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, FINV has been loosely correlated with QFIN. These tickers have moved in lockstep 64% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if FINV jumps, then QFIN could also see price increases.
| Ticker / NAME | Correlation To FINV | 1D Price Change % | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| FINV | 100% | +0.99% | ||
| QFIN - FINV | 64% Loosely correlated | +0.92% | ||
| LX - FINV | 54% Loosely correlated | +2.18% | ||
| YRD - FINV | 52% Loosely correlated | +2.04% | ||
| LU - FINV | 49% Loosely correlated | +3.10% | ||
| XYF - FINV | 39% Loosely correlated | +2.60% | ||
More | ||||