It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).
AHG’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileLPRO’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).
It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.
If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.
AHG’s TA Score shows that 4 TA indicator(s) are bullish while LPRO’s TA Score has 3 bullish TA indicator(s).
AHG (@Medical Distributors) experienced а -26.01% price change this week, while LPRO (@Finance/Rental/Leasing) price change was +0.79% for the same time period.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Distributors industry was +2.82%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -0.83%, and the average quarterly price growth was -12.30%.
The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Finance/Rental/Leasing industry was +1.44%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +6.60%, and the average quarterly price growth was +24.17%.
AHG is expected to report earnings on Dec 23, 2024.
LPRO is expected to report earnings on Feb 20, 2025.
Healthcare distribution market can be segmented into pharmaceutical product distribution services, medical device distribution services, and biopharmaceutical product distribution services. In addition to serving as intermediaries, many medical distributors also purchase and take legal ownership of pharmaceuticals and manage inventory and credit risk. According to a Deloitte report, pharmaceutical distributors’ core services of efficient product distribution, inventory management, financial risk management, and information-sharing generate $33 billion-$53 billion in value annually to the U.S. health care ecosystem. Some prominent players in the overall medical distribution industry include McKesson Corporation, AmerisourceBergen Corporation, Cardinal Health, Inc. and Patterson Companies, Inc.
@Finance/Rental/Leasing (+1.44% weekly)A leasing company (e.g. United Rentals, Inc. ) is typically the legal owner of the asset for the duration of the lease, while the lessee has operating control over the asset while also having some share of the economic risks and returns from the change in the valuation of the underlying asset. Per capita disposable income and corporate earnings or cash flow could be some of the critical metrics for this business – the higher the values of these metrics, the potentially greater ability of consumers/businesses to afford apartments/office spaces for rent. Other finance companies include credit/debit card payment processing companies (e.g. Visa Inc. and Mastercard), private label credit cards providers (e.g. Synchrony Financial) and automobile finance companies (e.g. Credit Acceptance Corporation).
AHG | LPRO | AHG / LPRO | |
Capitalization | 125M | 744M | 17% |
EBITDA | -28.9M | 40.7M | -71% |
Gain YTD | 18.986 | -25.264 | -75% |
P/E Ratio | N/A | 33.11 | - |
Revenue | 1.76M | 117M | 2% |
Total Cash | 15.1M | 240M | 6% |
Total Debt | 10M | 148M | 7% |
AHG | LPRO | ||
---|---|---|---|
OUTLOOK RATING 1..100 | 87 | 14 | |
VALUATION overvalued / fair valued / undervalued 1..100 | 65 Fair valued | 92 Overvalued | |
PROFIT vs RISK RATING 1..100 | 100 | 100 | |
SMR RATING 1..100 | 98 | 87 | |
PRICE GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 81 | 47 | |
P/E GROWTH RATING 1..100 | 2 | 4 | |
SEASONALITY SCORE 1..100 | n/a | 50 |
Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.
AHG's Valuation (65) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LPRO (92) in the null industry. This means that AHG’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.
AHG's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LPRO (100) in the null industry. This means that AHG’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.
LPRO's SMR Rating (87) in the null industry is in the same range as AHG (98) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that LPRO’s stock grew similarly to AHG’s over the last 12 months.
LPRO's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is somewhat better than the same rating for AHG (81) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry. This means that LPRO’s stock grew somewhat faster than AHG’s over the last 12 months.
AHG's P/E Growth Rating (2) in the Finance Or Rental Or Leasing industry is in the same range as LPRO (4) in the null industry. This means that AHG’s stock grew similarly to LPRO’s over the last 12 months.
AHG | LPRO | |
---|---|---|
RSI ODDS (%) | 2 days ago88% | 2 days ago82% |
Stochastic ODDS (%) | 2 days ago86% | 2 days ago82% |
Momentum ODDS (%) | 2 days ago87% | 2 days ago82% |
MACD ODDS (%) | 2 days ago83% | 2 days ago90% |
TrendWeek ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago73% |
TrendMonth ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago73% |
Advances ODDS (%) | 9 days ago87% | 2 days ago77% |
Declines ODDS (%) | 3 days ago90% | 5 days ago84% |
BollingerBands ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago79% |
Aroon ODDS (%) | 2 days ago90% | 2 days ago75% |
1 Day | |||
---|---|---|---|
MFs / NAME | Price $ | Chg $ | Chg % |
BUITX | 26.68 | 0.50 | +1.91% |
Buffalo Mid Cap Discovery Inst | |||
FSMCX | 17.83 | 0.31 | +1.77% |
Tributary Small/Mid Cap Institutional | |||
BAWAX | 55.21 | 0.60 | +1.10% |
Brown Advisory Sustainable Growth Adv | |||
AIVEX | 16.71 | 0.07 | +0.42% |
American Funds International Vntg F-1 | |||
PMIYX | 10.74 | N/A | N/A |
Putnam Multi-Asset Income Y |
A.I.dvisor tells us that AHG and FINV have been poorly correlated (+25% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHG and FINV's prices will move in lockstep.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To AHG | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
AHG | 100% | +0.06% | ||
FINV - AHG | 25% Poorly correlated | -0.16% | ||
LPRO - AHG | 23% Poorly correlated | +2.09% | ||
PRG - AHG | 23% Poorly correlated | -1.36% | ||
RWAY - AHG | 22% Poorly correlated | +1.08% | ||
LC - AHG | 21% Poorly correlated | +5.23% | ||
More |
A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, LPRO has been loosely correlated with GDOT. These tickers have moved in lockstep 49% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if LPRO jumps, then GDOT could also see price increases.
Ticker / NAME | Correlation To LPRO | 1D Price Change % | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
LPRO | 100% | +2.09% | ||
GDOT - LPRO | 49% Loosely correlated | +0.20% | ||
LC - LPRO | 48% Loosely correlated | +5.23% | ||
NNI - LPRO | 44% Loosely correlated | +0.54% | ||
WD - LPRO | 43% Loosely correlated | +1.03% | ||
UPBD - LPRO | 42% Loosely correlated | +2.74% | ||
More |