AHHLF
Price
$12.05
Change
-$0.44 (-3.52%)
Updated
Apr 26 closing price
SHMCF
Price
$7.73
Change
+$0.23 (+3.07%)
Updated
Oct 23 closing price
Ad is loading...

AHHLF vs SHMCF

Header iconAHHLF vs SHMCF Comparison
Open Charts AHHLF vs SHMCFBanner chart's image
Asahi Holdings
Price$12.05
Change-$0.44 (-3.52%)
Volume$200
CapitalizationN/A
Renewi
Price$7.73
Change+$0.23 (+3.07%)
Volume$609
CapitalizationN/A
AHHLF vs SHMCF Comparison Chart
Loading...
SHMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHHLF vs. SHMCF commentary
Dec 19, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHHLF is a Hold and SHMCF is a Buy.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Dec 19, 2024
Stock price -- (AHHLF: $12.05 vs. SHMCF: $7.73)
Brand notoriety: AHHLF and SHMCF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Environmental Services industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHHLF: 100% vs. SHMCF: 115%
Market capitalization -- AHHLF: $1.04B vs. SHMCF: $536.35M
AHHLF [@Environmental Services] is valued at $1.04B. SHMCF’s [@Environmental Services] market capitalization is $536.35M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Environmental Services] industry ranges from $85.6B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Environmental Services] industry is $6.24B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHHLF’s FA Score shows that 1 FA rating(s) are green whileSHMCF’s FA Score has 2 green FA rating(s).

  • AHHLF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
  • SHMCF’s FA Score: 2 green, 3 red.
According to our system of comparison, SHMCF is a better buy in the long-term than AHHLF.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

SHMCF’s TA Score shows that 1 TA indicator(s) are bullish.

  • SHMCF’s TA Score: 1 bullish, 1 bearish.

Price Growth

AHHLF (@Environmental Services) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while SHMCF (@Environmental Services) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Environmental Services industry was +0.60%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +1.63%, and the average quarterly price growth was +18.87%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Environmental Services (+0.60% weekly)

Environmental Services includes companies that collect and dispose of hazardous and non-hazardous waste. Their services include removal of toxic waste from soil, removing medical waste etc. Some companies also operate incinerators, sewerage systems, waste treatment plants, and landfills. Demand for waste management is likely to rise with increasing urbanization/industrialization. Waste Management, Inc., Republic Services, Inc., Waste Connections, Inc. and Tetra Tech, Inc. are some of the major companies in this business.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHHLF($1.04B) has a higher market cap than SHMCF($536M). SHMCF has higher P/E ratio than AHHLF: SHMCF (9.82) vs AHHLF (0.43). AHHLF YTD gains are higher at: -11.201 vs. SHMCF (-15.195). AHHLF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 20.2B vs. SHMCF (259M). AHHLF has more cash in the bank: 21.6B vs. SHMCF (62.2M). SHMCF has less debt than AHHLF: SHMCF (748M) vs AHHLF (144B). AHHLF has higher revenues than SHMCF: AHHLF (292B) vs SHMCF (1.89B).
AHHLFSHMCFAHHLF / SHMCF
Capitalization1.04B536M194%
EBITDA20.2B259M7,799%
Gain YTD-11.201-15.19574%
P/E Ratio0.439.824%
Revenue292B1.89B15,433%
Total Cash21.6B62.2M34,727%
Total Debt144B748M19,251%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
SHMCF: Fundamental Ratings
SHMCF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
42
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
58
Fair valued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
29
SMR RATING
1..100
95
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
57
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
16
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
50

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHHLFSHMCF
RSI
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bearish Trend 6 days ago
13%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
9%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
10%
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
13%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
26%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
SHMCF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
MFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
NSIDX15.73N/A
N/A
Northern Small Cap Index
GSVSX16.31N/A
N/A
Goldman Sachs Large Cap Value Svc
NUIIX28.78-0.07
-0.24%
Nuveen International Dividend Growth I
FTSIX39.70-0.54
-1.34%
FullerThaler Behvrl S-M Cor Eq Instl
JCNIX28.14-0.47
-1.64%
Janus Henderson Contrarian S

AHHLF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHHLF and TESI have been poorly correlated (+7% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHHLF and TESI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHHLF
1D Price
Change %
AHHLF100%
N/A
TESI - AHHLF
7%
Poorly correlated
-3.48%
TSPCF - AHHLF
5%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
AMBI - AHHLF
4%
Poorly correlated
-3.88%
LNZA - AHHLF
0%
Poorly correlated
-3.00%
SHMCF - AHHLF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

SHMCF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that SHMCF and TESI have been poorly correlated (+3% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that SHMCF and TESI's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To SHMCF
1D Price
Change %
SHMCF100%
N/A
TESI - SHMCF
3%
Poorly correlated
-3.48%
TSPCF - SHMCF
1%
Poorly correlated
-4.26%
ANRGF - SHMCF
0%
Poorly correlated
-6.67%
AHHLF - SHMCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NWLXF - SHMCF
-0%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More