AHICF
Price
$18.85
Change
+$1.05 (+5.90%)
Updated
Aug 21 closing price
Capitalization
4.58B
CLPBF
Price
$96.60
Change
+$1.32 (+1.39%)
Updated
Aug 28 closing price
Capitalization
21.4B
Interact to see
Advertisement

AHICF vs CLPBF

Header iconAHICF vs CLPBF Comparison
Open Charts AHICF vs CLPBFBanner chart's image
Asahi Intec
Price$18.85
Change+$1.05 (+5.90%)
Volume$269
Capitalization4.58B
Coloplast AS
Price$96.60
Change+$1.32 (+1.39%)
Volume$80
Capitalization21.4B
AHICF vs CLPBF Comparison Chart in %
Loading...
AHICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHICF vs. CLPBF commentary
Aug 30, 2025

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHICF is a Hold and CLPBF is a Hold.

Interact to see
Advertisement
COMPARISON
Comparison
Aug 30, 2025
Stock price -- (AHICF: $18.85 vs. CLPBF: $96.60)
Brand notoriety: AHICF and CLPBF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Pharmaceuticals: Other industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHICF: 6% vs. CLPBF: 25%
Market capitalization -- AHICF: $4.58B vs. CLPBF: $21.44B
AHICF [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] is valued at $4.58B. CLPBF’s [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] market capitalization is $21.44B. The market cap for tickers in the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry ranges from $169.86B to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Pharmaceuticals: Other] industry is $10.9B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHICF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileCLPBF’s FA Score has 1 green FA rating(s).

  • AHICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • CLPBF’s FA Score: 1 green, 4 red.
According to our system of comparison, both AHICF and CLPBF are a bad buy in the long-term.

Short-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a short-term outlook for a ticker by using Technical Analysis (TA) indicators. We use Odds of Success as the percentage of outcomes which confirm successful trade signals in the past.

If the Odds of Success (the likelihood of the continuation of a trend) for each indicator are greater than 50%, then the generated signal is confirmed. A green percentage from 90% to 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bullish trend. A red percentage from 90% - 51% indicates that the ticker is in a bearish trend. All grey percentages are below 50% and are considered not to confirm the trend signal.

AHICF’s TA Score shows that 0 TA indicator(s) are bullish while CLPBF’s TA Score has 6 bullish TA indicator(s).

  • AHICF’s TA Score: 0 bullish, 3 bearish.
  • CLPBF’s TA Score: 6 bullish, 3 bearish.
According to our system of comparison, CLPBF is a better buy in the short-term than AHICF.

Price Growth

AHICF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while CLPBF (@Pharmaceuticals: Other) price change was -1.27% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Pharmaceuticals: Other industry was +0.47%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was +5.74%, and the average quarterly price growth was +15.16%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Pharmaceuticals: Other (+0.47% weekly)

Pharmaceuticals (Other) comprise companies that are involved in the discovery, development or manufacturing of therapeutic and preventative medicines. They often collaborate with or acquire other pharmaceutical/healthcare firms. Examples of companies in this segment include Bausch Health Companies Inc., Icon Plc and Perrigo Company Plc.

SUMMARIES
Loading...
FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
CLPBF($21.4B) has a higher market cap than AHICF($4.58B). AHICF has higher P/E ratio than CLPBF: AHICF (59.24) vs CLPBF (34.30). AHICF YTD gains are higher at: -2.835 vs. CLPBF (-10.788). AHICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 35.9B vs. CLPBF (8.66B). AHICF has more cash in the bank: 41.6B vs. CLPBF (729M). AHICF has less debt than CLPBF: AHICF (3.57B) vs CLPBF (24.3B). AHICF has higher revenues than CLPBF: AHICF (115B) vs CLPBF (27.8B).
AHICFCLPBFAHICF / CLPBF
Capitalization4.58B21.4B21%
EBITDA35.9B8.66B415%
Gain YTD-2.835-10.78826%
P/E Ratio59.2434.30173%
Revenue115B27.8B414%
Total Cash41.6B729M5,706%
Total Debt3.57B24.3B15%
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHICF vs CLPBF: Fundamental Ratings
AHICF
CLPBF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
4986
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
88
Overvalued
17
Undervalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100100
SMR RATING
1..100
100100
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
4777
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
100100
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
3050

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

CLPBF's Valuation (17) in the null industry is significantly better than the same rating for AHICF (88). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew significantly faster than AHICF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBF's Profit vs Risk Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AHICF (100). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to AHICF’s over the last 12 months.

CLPBF's SMR Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as AHICF (100). This means that CLPBF’s stock grew similarly to AHICF’s over the last 12 months.

AHICF's Price Growth Rating (47) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (77). This means that AHICF’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.

AHICF's P/E Growth Rating (100) in the null industry is in the same range as CLPBF (100). This means that AHICF’s stock grew similarly to CLPBF’s over the last 12 months.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
AHICFCLPBF
RSI
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
25%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
38%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
59%
Momentum
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
48%
MACD
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
57%
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
53%
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
11%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
52%
Advances
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 10 days ago
49%
Declines
ODDS (%)
N/A
N/A
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
90%
Bearish Trend 2 days ago
64%
Aroon
ODDS (%)
N/A
Bullish Trend 2 days ago
49%
View a ticker or compare two or three
Interact to see
Advertisement
AHICF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
CLPBF
Daily Signalchanged days ago
Gain/Loss if bought
Show more...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
ETFs / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
FMET35.980.26
+0.72%
Fidelity Metaverse ETF
IWB356.731.27
+0.36%
iShares Russell 1000 ETF
PCRB49.070.08
+0.16%
Putnam ESG Core Bond ETF
MYMH24.47N/A
N/A
SPDR SSGA My2028 Municipal Bond ETF
PRFD51.06-0.04
-0.08%
PIMCO Preferred and Cp Sec Act Exc-Trd

AHICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHICF and AMBFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHICF and AMBFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHICF
1D Price
Change %
AHICF100%
N/A
AMBFF - AHICF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPBF - AHICF
26%
Poorly correlated
+1.39%
BFLY - AHICF
26%
Poorly correlated
+3.82%
TDVXF - AHICF
22%
Poorly correlated
+3.74%
FDMDF - AHICF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
More

CLPBF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor indicates that over the last year, CLPBF has been loosely correlated with CLPBY. These tickers have moved in lockstep 38% of the time. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is some statistical probability that if CLPBF jumps, then CLPBY could also see price increases.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To CLPBF
1D Price
Change %
CLPBF100%
+1.39%
CLPBY - CLPBF
38%
Loosely correlated
+0.10%
AHICF - CLPBF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WILLF - CLPBF
22%
Poorly correlated
N/A
QDEL - CLPBF
20%
Poorly correlated
+0.83%
ESLOY - CLPBF
20%
Poorly correlated
-0.90%
More