Ad is loading...
AHICF
Price
$19.40
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Feb 26 closing price
FDMDF
Price
$0.34
Change
-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Updated
Nov 1 closing price
Ad is loading...

AHICF vs FDMDF

Header iconAHICF vs FDMDF Comparison
Open Charts AHICF vs FDMDFBanner chart's image
Asahi Intec
Price$19.40
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$800
CapitalizationN/A
4DMEDICAL
Price$0.34
Change-$0.00 (-0.00%)
Volume$1.4K
CapitalizationN/A
AHICF vs FDMDF Comparison Chart
Loading...
View a ticker or compare two or three
VS
AHICF vs. FDMDF commentary
Nov 18, 2024

To compare these two companies we present long-term analysis, their fundamental ratings and make comparative short-term technical analysis which are presented below. The conclusion is AHICF is a Hold and FDMDF is a Hold.

COMPARISON
Comparison
Nov 18, 2024
Stock price -- (AHICF: $19.40 vs. FDMDF: $0.34)
Brand notoriety: AHICF and FDMDF are both not notable
Both companies represent the Medical Specialties industry
Current volume relative to the 65-day Moving Average: AHICF: 100% vs. FDMDF: 100%
Market capitalization -- AHICF: $5.63B vs. FDMDF: $156.31M
AHICF [@Medical Specialties] is valued at $5.63B. FDMDF’s [@Medical Specialties] market capitalization is $156.31M. The market cap for tickers in the [@Medical Specialties] industry ranges from $3.82T to $0. The average market capitalization across the [@Medical Specialties] industry is $8.03B.

Long-Term Analysis

It is best to consider a long-term outlook for a ticker by using Fundamental Analysis (FA) ratings. The rating of 1 to 100, where 1 is best and 100 is worst, is divided into thirds. The first third (a green rating of 1-33) indicates that the ticker is undervalued; the second third (a grey number between 34 and 66) means that the ticker is valued fairly; and the last third (red number of 67 to 100) reflects that the ticker is undervalued. We use an FA Score to show how many ratings show the ticker to be undervalued (green) or overvalued (red).

AHICF’s FA Score shows that 0 FA rating(s) are green whileFDMDF’s FA Score has 0 green FA rating(s).

  • AHICF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
  • FDMDF’s FA Score: 0 green, 5 red.
According to our system of comparison, FDMDF is a better buy in the long-term than AHICF.

Price Growth

AHICF (@Medical Specialties) experienced а 0.00% price change this week, while FDMDF (@Medical Specialties) price change was 0.00% for the same time period.

The average weekly price growth across all stocks in the @Medical Specialties industry was -4.23%. For the same industry, the average monthly price growth was -2.87%, and the average quarterly price growth was -6.14%.

Industries' Descriptions

@Medical Specialties (-4.23% weekly)

Medical specialties are companies that make equipment used by the health care industry. Equipment manufactured and distributed by these companies include dialysis machines, blood analysis equipment, surgical equipment, dental instruments, and diagnostic tools, among other items. Large companies typically aim to produce and distribute high-quality products across a broad market spectrum. Smaller firms are more likely to specialize in a particular market segment. Due to the industry’s close association with medical treatments, they typically have low sensitivity to macroeconomic fluctuations. Within this industry, Abbott Laboratories, Medtronic Plc and Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. are some of the companies with multi-billion market capitalizations in the U.S. stock markets.

FUNDAMENTALS
Fundamentals
AHICF($5.63B) has a higher market cap than FDMDF($156M). AHICF YTD gains are higher at: 17.079 vs. FDMDF (-37.483). AHICF has higher annual earnings (EBITDA): 19.2B vs. FDMDF (-33.73M). AHICF has higher revenues than FDMDF: AHICF (90.8B) vs FDMDF (1.38M).
AHICFFDMDFAHICF / FDMDF
Capitalization5.63B156M3,609%
EBITDA19.2B-33.73M-56,915%
Gain YTD17.079-37.483-46%
P/E Ratio49.26N/A-
Revenue90.8B1.38M6,560,694%
Total Cash36.8BN/A-
Total Debt13.6BN/A-
FUNDAMENTALS RATINGS
AHICF: Fundamental Ratings
AHICF
OUTLOOK RATING
1..100
50
VALUATION
overvalued / fair valued / undervalued
1..100
83
Overvalued
PROFIT vs RISK RATING
1..100
100
SMR RATING
1..100
63
PRICE GROWTH RATING
1..100
52
P/E GROWTH RATING
1..100
58
SEASONALITY SCORE
1..100
n/a

Tickeron ratings are formulated such that a rating of 1 designates the most successful stocks in a given industry, while a rating of 100 points to the least successful stocks for that industry.

TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Technical Analysis
RSI
ODDS (%)
Stochastic
ODDS (%)
Momentum
ODDS (%)
MACD
ODDS (%)
TrendWeek
ODDS (%)
TrendMonth
ODDS (%)
Advances
ODDS (%)
Declines
ODDS (%)
BollingerBands
ODDS (%)
Aroon
ODDS (%)
View a ticker or compare two or three
Ad is loading...
Interesting Tickers
1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
1 Day
STOCK / NAMEPrice $Chg $Chg %
PFSI102.471.23
+1.21%
PennyMac Financial Services
LNG212.301.52
+0.72%
Cheniere Energy
ILPT3.620.02
+0.56%
Industrial Logistics Properties Trust
KIRK1.59-0.03
-1.85%
Kirkland's
PUBM14.88-0.75
-4.80%
PubMatic

AHICF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that AHICF and AMBFF have been poorly correlated (+32% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that AHICF and AMBFF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To AHICF
1D Price
Change %
AHICF100%
N/A
AMBFF - AHICF
32%
Poorly correlated
N/A
CLPBF - AHICF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
BFLY - AHICF
26%
Poorly correlated
-8.20%
REMI - AHICF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TDVXF - AHICF
22%
Poorly correlated
-7.87%
More

FDMDF and

Correlation & Price change

A.I.dvisor tells us that FDMDF and FSPKF have been poorly correlated (+26% of the time) for the last year. This A.I.-generated data suggests there is low statistical probability that FDMDF and FSPKF's prices will move in lockstep.

1D
1W
1M
1Q
6M
1Y
5Y
Ticker /
NAME
Correlation
To FDMDF
1D Price
Change %
FDMDF100%
N/A
FSPKF - FDMDF
26%
Poorly correlated
N/A
TCHBF - FDMDF
25%
Poorly correlated
N/A
WUXIF - FDMDF
23%
Poorly correlated
N/A
AHICF - FDMDF
15%
Poorly correlated
N/A
NMTC - FDMDF
9%
Poorly correlated
-8.96%
More